I am not saying we should lynch people for bad plays
I am saying we should lynch people who we read as socially likely to be non-BD
I don’t see how this is complicated
I am not saying we should lynch people for bad plays
I am saying we should lynch people who we read as socially likely to be non-BD
I don’t see how this is complicated
That is admittedly a first
Not everyone use same definition
Acting in a manner indicative of them being scum
*even if it is unintentional
That assumes there is only 1 right way to read
Well, is there another right way to read?
No, but it does assume BD players take actions to indicate they are in fact BD
Which is like the whole point of a social game
What is the true way to read
Do not avoid my question. Is there another right way to read?
No it doesn’t
Whether you’re identifying scum based on VCA or chat activity patterns or whatever doesn’t change the fact that lynching scummy players should not be disincentivized beyond the risk of a mislynch
yes it does cuz there can be different prespectives to same action
Well I can’t say is there another if I don’t know the first one
If you don’t know how to read, then there’s an issue.
So now you’re saying scummy is any action scumread by someone
Oh I do know but I don’t say it is the only right way to read
No, scummy is not
Scummy is , as Arete and I put it:
Someone doesn’t have to scumread an action for them to be scummy.
Someone can even falsely scumread an action that was towny