You had a null read on me in that post, and you were replying to a post where Surveillance was basically dunking on me. I was a pretty polarizing/heavily scumread player at that point; you had a null read on me then?
You were heavily scumread but I didn’t see why you should be heavily scumread so early in the game based on your posts. That’s basically all I have from that point in time.
BTW to elaborate on this - I did see some merit in the scumreads on you but it looked like a lot of people were willing to echo the scumread on you and to be perfectly honest, gut tells me there may have been a wolf or two there. I don’t have concrete evidence so it’s just a suspicion.
I guess my natural follow up to this question would be - who do you think the wolves who were parroting the scumread on me are? I was being scumread by a lot of people who I think are town now, which is why I’m asking.
And OK. Reason why I was asking was that I found it hard to believe that you had a null read on me when I was pretty much the central focus of the game back then. Thought you would have some sort of read on me, whether good or bad, by then.
I honestly did not keep track of exactly which players scumread you I think the wagon was started by town, though, and the difference is how fast people jumped to clear you or consider that you might not be scum, versus players who really gave no reevaluation of you.
And yeah I specifically put you as null because of the fact that something told me you were town, probably mostly wagonomics, but I couldn’t find much to back it up until somewhere after that post. And you still aren’t my top townread so lol.
These are some of Officer’s early reads. Initially I was worried they were being opportunistic with their push on me, especially since they seemingly had no other thoughts despite there being over 100 posts in the thread at this time, however they gave some more. I can see how they get to their read on me and their other snapreads however I don’t think they’re particularly significant. The main thing to note here is how they thought Facilitator had produced more content, especially since I had a similar thought which makes me want to v read it even though I probably shouldn’t.
At the time, I thought this was a reasonable-sounding take, but it’s actually pretty hedgy especially with the lack of a stance after either point. Not a great look.
Again, another post I thought was reasonable but is actually incredibly hedgy.
@Officer It kind of looks like you’re sheeping the thread shifting in favour of me without actually considering it for yourself. Can you elaborate on why you changed your read on me here?
This is a pretty decent post. I can see how they came to this conclusion even though I might not agree. As a wolf here he’d be more likely to scrutinise the actual content of the post
Uh, I feel like this is a weird vote but I’m not sure why. I think this has some W/W equity, if for example Officer could see Facilitator going down early (which is honestly pretty likely the case) and wanted to gain some cred from being an early pusher. Not really sure what this says outside of that, though.
I was definitely townreading this slot too easily. Most of Officer’s content is pretty basic and hedgy. Their vote on facilitator felt pretty detached from the threadstate and not in a villagery way.
Traphouse had brought up facile as not having impactful posts and I agreed, it was on my mind and they had no votes yet. Felt like a good place for me to pressure.