im assuming only one of [intensify, zone] is scum, and explaining why it’s always intensify not zone here
starting a new wagon is ~worthless
but if you have a mistaken villager on your side + a scumbuddy to help you out, suddenly you have a pretty good ML candidate you can get to top wagon
honestly if you wanted to kill me for only this i wouldn’t have thought you were scum
that was a mistake
confused “kanave voting emilia” and “intensify unvoting me” and fucked up
im saying this from the pov of kanave
would you vote an emerging wagon or a stagnant one where one person seems angsty to move
that was my argument for saying y’all were cringe for pushing me
…the “new wagon” y’all enforced was the emilia wagon
that
wait what buffering....
yeah ok that makes sense
half of the mech hinges on people hidiing things and lying so forgive me if i stop making sense ._.
the social scumread on intensify for the emilia wagon still holds
being serious though
this wagon on me is… really fucking dumb.
the argument changed from “she’s underwhelming” to “she and wazza could be w/w because her action is weird” to “oh but maybe wazza is town but she’s still wolf” and at this point it’s just a logical fallacy because people are poking out different start points to all fit with me being a wolf
thats called controlling a narrative
this still doesn’t explain why you’re using a double standard to give different motivations behind intensify’s and zone’s actions when they did the same thing
i find it weird how you just drop the mech thing because of this? like it didn’t make sense anyway because my action obviously wasn’t a watch, but now you’ve been informed that if you think one of us is lying i always have to be scum it’s pretty weird you just drop it, because it looks like you deliberately want to scumread intensify more than me
No shrug
But I wouldn’t say that it’s particularly AI
we’ve acknowledged that I have the capability to powerwolf and I’m usually a decently strong wolf