Please nerf king execute

#1

I think the king is too swingy, one way to deal with it is to nerf the execute

1) King shoudnt be able to bypass MM death immunity.
MM way too important

2) When the king exe a hunter, and the hunter bear, the king should die.
No risk= no fun, good players can bypass it by telling a hunter to wolf someone.

3) When the possessor jump and the king exe him in the same turn, he won’t kill the posessor
If bd fail to exe the possessor on trial, no reason he shoudn’t be able to jump.

4) When the king and the possessor are the last people standing, the possessor will win the game
It’s doesnt make sense that the possessor needs an alch or sellsword to win the game, he should be able to win alone, and right now, he can’t kill the king, especially if there were more then 1 king in the game

1 Like
#2

That also makes no sense.

1 Like
#3

no

#4

Oh really? (Insert other sarcastic sentence here)

Despire the fact MM need a buff (In my opinion) if MM was target for an execute means he got caught which is complete normal.

Umm. why? This doesn’t explain anything.

This actually should be a thing from very beginning the reason why it isn’t still a mystery.

2 Likes
#5

The King should never even had OE in the first place. The entire point of the King is supposed to be a socially-oriented one and also a leader in the court, not to be a killing role.

The King overall needs a rework, especially one to fit in with the game’s asymmetrical nature like I suggested in my YAKRS thread or how FoL handles the King.

4 Likes
#6

It wasn’t because no matter what body you switch to it doesn’t change the fact that you are dead

#7

So a dumb reason, okay.

It’s like someone shooted someone and while the victim tried to dogde it, “homing” bullet got him anyway.

#8

Possession isn’t a dodge. Other ability’s still target you too. And anyone targeting the person you jump to doesn’t target you.

#9

Huh. Regardless it’s still illogical. Which is fine probably.

#10

Evil kings be swingy on the prince. Good kings wait until you have a confirmed evil to OE, if prince doesn’t get him.

This is bad for the sole purpose that you can always hang them on trial. OE and they don’t die? easy MM, NK or alch/phys.

King oe is intended not to visit, so this is a stupid idea.

Because there is an order of things in play and why all NKs need to kill the king asap. or, you know, not claim sus knight claims.

Show proof, because in all ways king will be the usual winner.

  1. King ups the poss
  2. King guards himself and ups poss
  3. King OEs poss.
#11

Nerf it or remove it, I dont really care, but i do agree that king second ability should be social oriented,

1 Like
#12

OE is fine. It encourages people to claim to the king. It needs a buff if anything.

That would make it useless.

No. OE doesn’t count as a visit, and bear only affects visitors.

This is the only thing I agree with. This interaction doesn’t make sense.

Only at night. During the day the king can still finger.

There’s nothing wrong with the king having a single killing ability. Several classes have abilities that aren’t related to their type. OE encourages people to claim to the king. I do agree that the king needs another rework though.

#13

It’s simply how the mechanics of the game interact.

The Possessor trying to change body’s with possession doesn’t change the fact that he is dead and there is no reason why it would.

It’s just like if you use Frenzy to kill the Possessor. No part of possessions effect would stop the kill or undo the kill, so he dies. Simple as that.

1 Like
#14

But you kill the other body.

See your bob the possessor

The enforcer frenzies the assassin.

Now the assassin stabs you. But the possessor jumps at the same time leading to the possessor “dying”

That is what should happen

1 Like
#15

If all kills happen at the same time then the possessor would kill his victem at the same time he is killed (thus you are left with 2 dead bodies)