Mountainous is extremely controversial ikr :^)
Shaming a reviewer while not being ready to even do the most basic stuff for your game and still wanting it to get approved… this won’t do any good.
1 Like
I got @Twil1ight as Co-host
I am giving you a ping that I found co-host for Enemy Within 4 so you can change “TBD”
1 Like
ok
gamers
can we please have some better type of explination for what the game types are.
Mole i’m not picking on you this is just a recent example of a problem I relate to and I imagine many other people do.
Things like “SFoL” and “FoL” are easy
But then we get into more complicated things and there is no guide to what something falls over
What is standard? what is special? when does something stop being vanilla.
When is something a mash? or a minimash? just
aaa
Join me people of the world
we must unite to fix this problem
4 Likes
These are the terms I use and find quite decent
Standard = Without any modifiers such as anonymous
Anon/Anonymous = Fully anonymous game
Competitive = Competitive game
Mash = >30 players
Minimash = More than or equal to 25 players, less than or equal to 30 players
Special = Bastard games, any uncommon mechanics, setups designed outside of standard mafia or revokation of a certain FM rule (Grande Idea would fall under DOoSM for example); or just that any other category is inapplicable
Vanilla = Anything with 50% or more of roles as mafia goon + vanilla town
2 Likes
But… what exactly are the usual FM mechanics, and what is unusual? That’s rather a blurry and confusing definition for people without a lot experience on multiple FM sites
Btw I doubt that you can see GI as SFoL anymore, I think most of the classes there are just mafia classes, and don’t reference fol in any way anymore, be it by lore, fluff or by mechanics
I’d consider anything ‘original’ or very uncommon to be special
Like a full neighborhood game
Also, iirc there was a very old definition how much similarity a game has to have with FoL to be called an SFoL
But in Amelia’s setups there is no doubt anyways
SFoL 65 will have zero classes or factions that exist in FoL.
so i think that the current definition of SFoL is more liberal than you think.
Your game is a direct successor of other sfols, so I don’t really think there should be a problem?
But yea, if it wouldnt have these predecessor sfols, there would be 0 reason to call it an sfol
