Queue/Submit Discussion Thread

[DatBird]

@DatBird

Due to a recent tread in activity, i think for the better of the queue we will be going back to a two games at a time pace for ongoing games, thus nothing will follow FOL 29. And instead TOL 2399 and Joat will be our two games.

To coincide we are making a mandatory posts per day rule to be added to every game already reviewed and those that will enter review. 20 will be the standard. Any less will have to be brought up with your reviewer and be approved, and more is fine. But reminder you prob shouldn’t have 50 posts minimum in a 12/12. So we hope this will improve the site’s play.

Feel free to discuss in the queue discussion thread, be civil. And we are open to more ideas

if anyone wants to discuss do it here

[TheBlueElixir]

Purgatory should probably change its start date and

20 posts per day

I dont think that really changes anything, but maybe itll make stuff run a little better(but if hyperposting is the problem maybe not) but I dont care too much

I agree with the 2-games thing, seeing as a 15 and a 30p game probably shouldnt run alongside an 18p

[KyoDaz]

NewD3 nearly didn’t have enough players in a 9p setup
JoaT^2 hasn’t filled as a 15p setup in like… 3 days?
I agree with it limited to 2.

[Marshal]

I think the 3/2/1 aka large/medium/small system works pretty well

and yeah, a large setup and 2 medium ones running at the same time would be no

[anon97870008]

@DatBird

To coincide we are making a mandatory posts per day rule to be added to every game already reviewed and those that will enter review. 20 will be the standard.

On which way will this be enforced?

(I remember that I barely had 100 posts in my first D5 newbie game, despite being as active as possible. I suggest leniency for newbies, as long as it’s clear that they do effort)

[DatBird]

Basically post 20 times a day. Thats it. If not u get warned, if u do it again, force replace out. Like the thing is no activity is killing games, so this forces people to play.

[Moleland]

I’m generally against ‘X posts or deet’ but as a rule of thumb it works

[DatBird]

Like as for new players, i dont want to say no they can just ignore this rule, but like if we dont be consistant when does not being a newbie end

[anon97870008]

20 meme posts vs 19 wallposts with lots of effort
Exact numbers are always questionable, but it’s a good start. Force replacing someone with 19 wallposts would be laughable tho, so yea, some human common sense should be required

[DatBird]

the thing is it should probably say game related posts. We would rather have the 19 wallposts. Its like wotm u know. Like if someones actively trying sure, if i saw 19 wallposts i woundnt consider yelling, but if its 19 meme posts sure

[DatBird]

Its to like jumpstart activity and trying, more than trying to shut down on it if it makes sense.

[anon97870008]

Sounds reasonable

[Soulshade55r]

I’d make it so 20 posts per day but a exception depending on the hosts thoughts about if someone has been contributing

EG: Timmy has 15 posts but they are all good quality wall posts ect.

Maybe make it so players posting under 20 will undergo a review

[DatBird]

thats why theres a bit of wotm in there

[DatBird]

like if host is thinking the play is fine, then ok. Theres also those days where day ends before people get online so u cant punish in that situation

[Soulshade55r]

I guess it’s very game dependent ect.

[Geyde]

how will my dayless FM™ work

[Geyde]

reduce it to 10 posts and we good

[DatBird]

Wotm

[DatBird]

I disagree, if u really feel u need less bring it up with reviewer, 20 on topic posts aint hard