not saying it’s wolfy but that does not convince me
I’m unironically pretty happy voting in the dumb thunderdome marl wanted because I didn’t like his vote on Wazza and I already had sus on Chloe so either way I don’t think it’s a bad hang.
1 Like
i doubt it’s really agenda when most of her reads (coincidentally?) are aligning with our poe
haven’t payed a ton of attention tothe specific direction of the content, give me a few minutes to really grind her iso
Appel’s push towards Marl looked pretty weak to me. But then again half of it was talking about random meta stuff I can’t comment on.
yeah but i feel like most of the time people start talking about meta from a random game and having a massive argument it usually ends up being a villager
idk
it also doesn’t feel like agenda
appel genuinely believes marl obvtowns himself early in the game (she’s said this in other games)
why would she encourage him to do this as a wolf
1 Like
Eh maybe. Personally when I’m bad I like pushing someone I have history with on purpose (PKR best for this lol) because no one can ever read the interactions and it quickly gets off topic from reads. Is that something Appelsini might do?
Well about the post as a whole you seem to be reading everything everyone has to say
For specific posts I like the ones about eli and arctic
uhhh
i’ve only been with her in a wolfgame once and i don’t recall it really happening but idk for sure
The fact that you don’t immediately jump to conclusions even though your pretty sure they are good
Your three profile images are all so similair colour-scheme wise I keep getting confused.
fair enough
ftr atlas when you are explaining reads
every time you make a statement
ask yourself how you would respond to it if someone said “why”. And keep doing that for each statement until you think it gets into the realm of ‘common sense’ (however you’d define that)
otherwise I will personally ask you why each time