Isn’t chess suppose to be played with another person.
Is anyone bothered about who we are playing against as there is only 1 king?
Isn’t chess suppose to be played with another person.
Is anyone bothered about who we are playing against as there is only 1 king?
Maybe aswell as being a piece scum control the other side and we vote on our move
/confirm Interesting setup
All i know is the other castle is scum so get them first
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE
I wonder if all pieces have the same kind of powers like pawns having the same abilities. I guess not.
/consume class
Class power won’t be linked to chess pieces i imagine, it’ll be rolled separately.
There must be some relevance other than being a named “insert class”.
Oh it’s relevant but I bet it’s not linked to our class
/confirm
What else could it be linked to? Alignment is even more doubtful to me. Something as obvious as making one scum rook and one town rook seems unlikely and I wouldn’t know what other pattern could emerge.
Not linked to anything
Special events maybe? Or maybe pawns have extra ability, rook a shield, King double vote ect?
Maybe it’s obvious to make us think it won’t happen? (probably not tho)
Like Htm’s Noughts and Crosses game, the position on the board was not linked to anything like roles or alignment (apart from the middle who is IC) but the position was still very relevant to the game.
I’m expecting it to be a far more chaotic version of that.
We are also just only one side of the board, so that is also very strange. I hope we learn more as the game progresses.
I reckon scum will have control of the other side of the board as well as their own class, and if we lose the chess game, we lose.
This would be the perfect game to make two games connect to each other somehow.
Like another game has the other half of the board that would be a awesome idea.
But maybe not actually cuz if scum rolled King it would just be gg