just a friendly tip: don’t make references to how you would act as a wolf in that exact situation. it does not help when it comes to biasing people against your case.
it’s WIFOM, derps. don’t touch it. i’m letting it slide with napoleon in a way i’m not with possessed because napoleon doesn’t play FM as much. just don’t read into it unless you can’t avoid it.
that’s bound to end in gambler’s fallacy, italy. I don’t think meta with how specific players don’t interact is worthwhile. generally meta with how people interact with each other is useless allignment-wise because it’s basically just universal constants such as “marshal OUTS arete as a NERD using FACTS and LOGIC which eventually leads to a spiral that invariably results in the death of one of them at the hands of the other” and “emilia and italy have a flame war”
i mean as in how people interact with specific other people. obviously, how people interact is the most useful part of meta. just. not specific people.
Anyway, I’m getting v vibes from italy. They don’t feel like ToLFM italy in that while they do a lot of off-topic stuff they still have a certain focus here that I don’t really get from there? I mean, there’s a focus in ToLFM, but that is specifically the wolf agenda in that game, something that I am naturallly privy to.
I can’t really identify it using quotes with the amount of time I have now. I’m just going to put italy in the “don’t touch for now but work with” pile for now and revisit them later.
I was on mobile and trying to reply on mobile sometimes makes me lose my spot
that’s why I wish I’d switched to laptop first 