Maybe the 2 hunter claims?
Why is 2 hunter claims more important than possible NK?
I am serious, stop wasting time to get two hunter claims prove themselves.
Margaret is obvious third non-killing neutral so there’s no need to prove that.
She didn’t infect me with her wolf so she’s obviously lying, but the stupid town thinks otherwise.
Prince is still alive, they can deal with that by keeping them in jail.
WHY?
The other hunter claim is third non-killing neutral, not from infected faction
So there’s no need for it
You don’t actually know that, the other hunter claim COULD be the Neutral Killer also.
Not really, they manage to kill two nights successfully and so does the Patient Zero - except for N2.
But I assure you I am not the patient zero before I become Plaguebearer. This makes no sense.
Also do your abilities fail if you used them on a guy who died that night? Because I used mine on Marcus and it failed.
He’s jailed that night which is known at D2.
Good to know, that’s why it failed.
And I also lead the wagon getting Insanity lynched D2 to see if he flips Lab Assistant or Warlock, I made the right call to get him killed.
Yes, I did that based on other people’s evidence and it should have been done that.
Okay so the guy we have up right now. What are they claiming I couldn’t see a claim from them anywhere.
Listen, the town is led by stupid prince and observer who thinks they should do things this way.
It’s like pardoning Marl the NK to use him to kill scum while I was Marshall in Return of Blue Dragon II
@Wazza He claims Crusader on trial, I read him again if he made logs or not.
Why are you against him being executed in jail?
Also I’m still sure it’s Infected Regent as they force pardoned the Plaguebearer knowing full well we wanted to execute them.
Yeh, we can still execute him in jail since Prince is still alive
This is what happened last night.
Does that means…?