[SFoL] 52 Clash Of Cults - The Blue Dragon are Victorious!

I think the king is a good one to ask. I want some more from our king.

I probably wouldnt be unbiased

1 Like

@Centuries or @Teleology?

Ozz was one of my strongest town reads so I would for sure be biased

Double Negative makes me A N G E R Y

Shading Arete would not have contributed to a scum agenda because Arete was not and is not getting lynched today. There would be no point throwing shade on Arete in that situation, when everyone else is focused on a different matter.
Derps was keeping an open mind and looking for possibilities.
Cult!Derps:

  • If Ozz was BD, Derps would probably be pushing to seal the mislynch instead of trying to associate him.
  • If Ozz was Cult, Derps would not associate him either unless he was on the opposing team. And associating with Arete of all people? Why associate Ozz with Arete? Arete would not be a good mislynch target. Nobody was thinking about Arete.

In general I think Derps is just BD.

Actually he totally would if they were scumbuds and Derps thought Ozz was getting lynched. But still. Arete is a very odd choice of target.

I do it because it seems less townie if you say you are biased. ā€œNot unbiasedā€ sounds way better

:eyes: what does that say about me then?

:eyes::eyes:

MAGNUS

A lot of fluff but I read this BD. I donā€™t want to go deeper into this.

Not lynching Magnus. Moving on.

I know, really weird read. But trust me, Iā€™m confident about this.

Magnus is BD.

Magnus has been magnusing this game

Thatā€™s like most easily fakeable part of playing Mafia though, itā€™s easy to give an illusion of doing something while not bringing up anything new and just sheeping. Iā€™ve ISOā€™d him earlier on and he just keep jumping on newly started wagons and his reads do not really seem logic. You also seem to skip a lot of stuff and just focus on finding points that you can town read him on, scum will never not have any townlike posts, and also on Arete, a big part of playing mafia is to not always try and mislynch the most obvious targets and instead try and push for the less obvious targets that can still be mislynched, we shouldnā€™t be reading him off the fact he decided to push a semi unorthodox target. All I see from Derps is him trying to find a wagon to apply pressure upon to try and make said person panic and get lynched

(those thoughts are just mashed potato tier bc I cba to actually reword the whole thing)

@Centuries thoughts?

The way Iā€™m going about my lurker/LHF reads is that I start off as null, then macro and micro-read some stuff. So far I think some of Derpā€™s posts have been BD enough for me to not read him as scum.

I might be micro-reading the wrong posts though.

But like, there again, youā€™re reading someone off what sounds like Gut and, if you were to do ISOs, I would much rather see you make them on active people that arenā€™t towncore, youā€™re TRā€™ing him for what seems to me no reason and sure the read existing is useful but itā€™s not helping us progress. What I seem to see from you is that you read people with very little but once again as Iā€™ve seen earlier you donā€™t seem to manage to make me understand how youā€™re reading them

He posted that and left too, you can scroll up to see my response as well.

Moving on.

JAKE

There is nothing I have to read here. 17 posts and no meaningful content.
Hyperlurking activated.

This is so out of left field that I think what Centuries said earlier about scum-motivated ā€˜suggestionsā€™ applies here. What was the point of that? There was no follow-up on that either.

CONSENSUS:

JakeTheWolfie is Cult to me. Iā€™m fine with lynching him as well.

Iā€™m afraid to say that I suck at reading posts that are made when iā€™m not here but from what I see it sounds like ragetown and those are hard to read, also fits the ā€œhe sounds like he cares about the game so itā€™s townā€ clichĆ© but itā€™s as shit an argument as TWTBAW so ye donā€™t know

1 Like

Iā€™m trying very hard to explain my reads in-depth. Youā€™re saying I should explain how Iā€™m reading them? As in, my methods?

And whatā€™s your opinion on my response to what he said?