[SFoL] 52 Clash Of Cults - The Blue Dragon are Victorious!

Wow its like comedy is subjecive, its like something I found funny can or cannot be funny to others. WOW

I thought it was kinda funny

I did, yeah. I do feel like two posts arenā€™t really enough to capture all of the important and contentful posts in my Iso, but I do appreciate that youā€™re Isoing people.

The rest do not warrant attention. Itā€™s NAI, based on how Iā€™ve seen you play in other games.

how do you do the thing where you make a wall post appear in a tab you have to open?

Sure they do. You can figure out a fair amount based on things like read progression (which admittedly I donā€™t have very much of, yet, since I donā€™t have very much content). Like, the random :eyes: and such are NAI, but the analysis Iā€™ve given isnā€™t necessarily so.

(Indeed, in SFoL 51, Possessed was initially suspicious of me, and I assume there was something to that.)

If it isnā€™t funny it doesnā€™t come across as a joke and that is where the confusion arose.

Which is why Iā€™m not quoting your other lines; I canā€™t analyze your read progression. Now it feels like to me that you want me to credit you for your analysis, but this is usual behavior and not worthy of attention when trying to read you. I didnā€™t say they were irrelevant, but they donā€™t tell me a lot about you. Iā€™ll read through it again though, though the only things Iā€™ll probably asking you are for reasoning or clarification (I didnā€™t have any questions the first time so I doubt Iā€™ll have them again).

In NFoL4, I tried analyzing NAI D1 way too much and in the end, itā€™s told me nothing. Tele was still evil. Marshal was evil. Ozz was evil.

And I explained it was a joke in the quote you sent earlier saying it was sarcasm, so idk why your getting so confused now. I can see Teo being confused on it in the moment and thats why I replied, since I didnt include a /s in the original message. But u strictly pointed out that I said it was sarcasm with the other two messages. So why is there confusion. Its a joke, you pointed out it a joke with the sarcasm quote, just because it wasnt funny to you, doesnt mean that it doesnt come across as a joke to others especially with full context that you have

I take that sarcasm thing as NAI. Doesnā€™t inherently feel scummy.

No, like I said earlier I donā€™t think people from their points of view should be townreading me particularly strongly at this point, I just think itā€™s relevant.

Itā€™s relevant when it shows me something about read progression (in terms of reading you). I just took what I found to be your highlights and pointed them out.

Iā€™m slight-leaning Ozz being town, besides his early meme-ing which Iā€™m interpreting as NAI, he actually seems to have an interest in solving the game and stopping the meme-ing to an extent a few hours into the game.

Yes I have full context now and now understand

Pkr is a veteran and he has always been like this.

So you donā€™t think it could be a scumslip? Saying King is 80% of helping seems like it comes from a cult mindset to me. He subconsciously saw king as only 20% his and therefore, 80% against him (i.e town).

I donā€™t feel like Ozz would meme this much at the beginning as an evilā€¦ itā€™s his third game and Iā€™d say heā€™d try and mimick NFoL4 without the small slips in between. I think I have a town-lean on ozz, but Iā€™d say the memeing contributes to that. (of course, if he had done absolutely no gamesolving it would be a different story)

I havenā€™t played in three months, so Iā€™m staying away from meta reading.

Idk how I feel about this, kinda feels like an attempt to stop read progression. Townreads Day 1 are good IMO.

Not when there is a double convert.