The ideal players would keep the rules and would create the good atmosphere on theireselves.
yeah unfortunately youāre wrong
you designed the setup, and you canāt remove you from the setup any more. All closed setups have ideosyncracies.
you might as well take advantage of that fact and make a more interesting game.
Ah you see
This runs counter to why Clown Fiesta was so fun
Because I was panicking the entire game and rebalancing everything in 2 second intervals
Eh, the difference here is that Priestess is talking about a pre-existing semi-open setup when weāre talking about closed setups.
Being red-checked by 2 different players n1 is not exactly my idea of fun, though. =/
1 Like
Looks at Airship Zeppriphon and NSFM and those two games wouldnt be the same without the great hosting
You are right. I know nothing about closed setups. I hate them personally ^^ I only wanted to play here since I thought it was semi-closed - giving evils unknown abilities while not changing the rules and mechanics.
In an open or semi-open setup, I agree with you; the host is a robot who executes instructions. In a closed setup, however, even when there is no host interaction, I would argue it is the duty of the host to create a setup that takes advantage of the fact it is closed by including what are effectively traps; they donāt have to be for the villagers, of course, they could be for the wolves, because otherwise all weāve done is made an open setup and put a cloth over it.
3 Likes
Tbh, the wolf team there sucked, tbh. Sulit didnāt have time to play, Uni was a newb who outed themselves for no reason d1, and I got 2 players who donāt bother playing the game when they rand wolf as scumbuds.
And PKR somehow managed to become wolfier after he was greenpeeked, which should be impossible. He then moved into my basement.
None of the rules were changed. Luxy hit a player who was under the effect of a day reflector that bypassed immunities.
Scum reactionary roles with no purpose (ninja with no track or watch, or godfather with no cop)