Actually yeah, Soulcatcher shouldn’t be able to revive again after being converted. Good catch.
I’m being sarcastic
Revive was bullshit and never should have existed
but the people balancing it thought
“oh, making the strongest power ever unstoppable is a good idea to ensure there are no feels bad moments”
Half these classes were made by Ici and Pug 5 months ago for RotBD III lol
Vul has already helped me in making a lot of good balance changes tho
Added a clause that keeps the Soulcatcher’s revive target alive if the Soulcatcher gets converted. Also added a clause that you cannot revive a player again if you did it as Unseen and got converted.
I think my current versions are as good as it gets when it comes to balancing this and also have potential for interesting interactions.
Scum have more counter play to the revive than you think.
- The revived player isn’t unconvertable if you wanna go there.
- You can convert before they revive.
- You can convert after they revive.
- You can kill them before they are able to revive.
- You can occupy or redirect them.
And both revives are highly conditional. One is a 1 for 1 and the other is timed.
The revives are naturally stronger late game but late game it’s more likely the reviver has been converted, so it’s a double-edged sword.
I think this is fine now.
@Maxwell Not sure how you like my Knight/Crusader rework from earlier. I considered removing the sacrifice ability.
You should probably also learn the visitors themselves and which alignment each visitor is.
Now the converted versions of the Marshal seem underwhelming but that’s something I will have to work on tomorrow.
Yes lol
Maybe it’s a bit underpowered for a CtA
done working on this for now – im exhausted