Jane’s claim feels pure to me. I think they at least started this game as a Noble, and I’m not very fond of convert hunting this early, so I want to look elsewhere for our wagons tbh. This can be an invest check / target for offensives.
Their d1 was subpar but there isn’t a lot to work with since they came into the thread very late, but nothing pinged me as extremely wolfy. Sure their opener had a lack of conclusions and confidence but that can come from either alignment. Their d2, in my opinion, has been much worse, especially the vote on Ivo at the start, which seemed opportunistic and the reasoning was flawed. They have also been sidelining for a long time.
I already stated that a few things give me pause with voting Jane, including the fact that I think Peter is pushing in bad faith, and that Gilbert’s wagon never picked up any steam, but their claim made me second guess the vote even more.
I called them out for a direct contradiction and they continued to post and reply with the same mindset of “I fucked up,” rather than freezing on the spot, which is what I expected this player to do if they were a wolf - seeing as how they have been sidelining for a while and their d1 opener lacked strong reads, I didn’t take them as very confident, really. (Though this is a flawed mindset, since it’s my personal opinion of what this specific player would have done).
The claim is unnecessarily complicated and I think a wolf would have a more ironed-out fakeclaim, especially if they see a wagon forming quickly on them. They could very easily have claimed a gossip on Sarah rather than Thomas, and it wouldn’t have contradicted what they said earlier today.
Their tone feels genuine.
