Yes, this one. https://forum.imperium42.com/t/official-hosting-guide/76043/112
I asked for clarification onto rules and I got an answer now you’re changing it so we should make it other way around if everyone agrees to balance then we balance by your logic
The global aim and standard on this forum is balanced games. That’s the reference point here. Not Wazza’s comment buried into around 100 posts of Wazza alt shenanigans. Especially with new players in the mix.
I asked to clarify and I got answered by host on it
Anyone else could have done the same if they wanted now by your logic we should make a vote where it becomes balanced only if everyone agrees on it since I am the minority in this case wich I forced to play
You’d be hard pressed to even find a majority for it, I’d hope, if you’d transparently add this to the OP:
This game might be heavily imbalanced and you might roll a class with zero percent chance of winning.
You’re the one who is against making majority vote wich I agreed on
No you can read op and if something isn’t clarified you ask it from host not assume something instead
No, because the global standard which you could reasonably expect is that it’s balanced, so that doesn’t hold up.
Why are you so against that if that is literally what imbalanced means…? That is being transparent instead of
This.
There is nothing that stops you clarifying something you didn’t understand or wasn’t mentioned I asked and I got an answer now you’re changing it an I am minority wich is forced to play now we should make a vote where we balance things only if everyone agrees
Also if we go this way there is no reason to assume that game named chaos and has a lot of factions with no clarification on how they will be rolled instead of that any of them can be present is balanced
I’m not going to continue this discussion. If you have a problem with reviewing setups in general, then make a petition or gather enough actual forum support to make it apparent that that is the course that should be taken.
As this game’s reviewer, I’m stepping up with making the necessary stipulations that weren’t made before. I’m only human and was reviewing 5 setups at that point in time after all. My only objective is to do my best to give every player a reasonable chance of winning. I’m not allowing 1 Sheriff with 16 scum players to automatically lose on day 1. If you don’t like it, too bad.
You’re just continuously trying to “win” this discussion on technicalities and I’m done playing along.
1 Like
I mean, to be fair I did send you the previous persons game, you just didn’t read the op yourself.
To be fair though I’ll probably remove some roles I have no idea that they do.
Doesn’t mean you’d 1 for 1 copy it though and then say that 14 neutrals can be rolled. I mean… it’s common sense to a degree. Just send me the roll before you distribute it please.
1st of all) obvious joke
2nd of all) if you really believe it’s all any you really have no faith in me