Reason why fool is bad is because it seems like a good idea on paper. The spiritualist seems like a good idea on paper. But if you put it in practice it doesn’t work out. The Fool makes the game worse for other people as it defeats the point of trying to scumhunt while the NK defeats the point of joining the game.
Exactly. You don’t have to try hard to win, so if you don’t like being Scum you can coast the game as a basic knight.
Did you read the game or try to skim it. Everyone hated that game. I wanted to try that game but I rolled that class and could do essentially nothing but clog the game. The fool is a Same. You can’t really do anything but just die. If you try to scumhunt you look good so it’s essentily just boring. The NK was removed becayse it made the game a living hell for both the NK and players
I get his point, I really do. However, I’d imagine with such seasoned vets of FoL, they could decipher a fool from Scum. Which forces a Fool to evolve their Scum game and look a specific way.
Also it provides a crutch for bad scum players. It’s impossible to tell the difference between being bad and being fool
just because you don’t believe in me having a point in something doesn’t mean I don’t.
1 Like
Most people knew Magnus was fool. He didn’t evolve his game; if he did, and he played fool how it was meant with disguise…it could have been a tricky situation.
No it wouldn’t, we want good wolves not bad ones. They just need to get better.
1 Like