[SFoL] SFoL 50: ๐”Š๐”ฏ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ก๐”ข โ„‘๐”ก๐”ข๐”ž - Endgame

Marg immediately stopped pushing on DatBird, so I donโ€™t think weโ€™re in a thunderdome.

one said they got a passive when getting the rolecard, other didnโ€™t

so one or the other has to be bsing unless thi sis some sort of huge moderror

datbird (a guy) says he got the card but bc he wasnโ€™t a girl he got it swapped out for maid

marg says she got the card but didnโ€™t get the girl passive

I still think theyโ€™re both neutral, not likely to be NK, or at least not a huge threat.

So why isnโ€™t Margaret pushing on DatBird?

she wants a check on me

Like if nything if we have two invests one should be on me and one should be on her, to solve this but thats not confirmed if we even have two invs

which is why i think sheโ€™s slightly scummier than datbird

she thinks that some rule made it so she didnโ€™t get it but that rule doesnโ€™t really apply to it?

Iโ€™m basically getting SFoL28 d1 vibes from this situation, really.

If Marg was telling the truth and DatBird is a wolf, then why would she just drop this issue for no reason?

If DatBird is telling the truth and Marg is a wolf, then why would she raise this question in the first place as then sheโ€™d be lynched over it?

IMO I donโ€™t think this conflict is guaranteed to have a wolf within them.

can you give like a quick run down for those that werent in that game?

Blizer claimed Maid and said that he received the results from a day ability that informs if the target has Royal Blood.

However recently there were changes that made the Maid receive the results during the night, and the game was rolled after these changes, however because of the changes to standard FoL rules it was a closed setup who didnโ€™t use the recent changes.

So because Blizer claimed that he, truthfully may I add, had received the results because of the changes, he ended up getting mislynched over it.

In short, I think Marg/You could be a potential TvT argument caused because of poor communication regarding mechanics between the hosts and players.

I was one of the few players who was defending Blizer as the entire argument against him was downright nonsensical to happen in a closed setup, to add.

And it certainly could be, Invest that claimed already will check me and if there are any ther they check Marg.
We need a lynch for today who would you recommend?

or just ignore sulitโ€™s theory until its toooo latee

1 Like

ooh what theory

\o
=o

1 Like

That this is an all neutral/small party game. So itโ€™s useless bickering if one of you is scum 'cus chances are you both are

so you are claiming that you are neutral/scum because otherwise you wouldnโ€™t say that

also this isnโ€™t a bastard game, although it may contain slight bastard elements

also iโ€™m town so that theory is out of the window

small parrty

wtf is small party thennn

small town party