Perhaps better wording: when I have an answer I believe in.
Actually I think it’s +EV to claim here, not because of how it affects me but how it affects the thread
I’m an Aristo, I’m Bountying a nullish slanky lowposter tonight
If you would like to not be bountied then don’t be a nullish slanky lowposter
This has been a PSA
This is not a reactiontest
My approach to this game will largely depend on what happens throughout. Right now, we are in the shitposting stage, my least favorite part of the game. I’m patiently waiting for the phase to end so that I have alignment indicative posts to analyze.
Theoretically, I could already go digging for opening strings of posts which feel forced, but one: I do not believe my early reads have ever been fantastic and two: I have not gone to the trouble of doing that yet. I might change my mind later. If I get a read I believe in, I am likely to share it.
Note: Arete’s claim is not and should not be treated as alignment indicative.
Vulgard did you roll scum two games in a row
I just noted that an inquisitor literally wouldn’t be able to find an arbiter heretic
Or alternatively did someone hack your account
looks at Amelia
What
Nobody has hacked my account. I made a conscious choice to change my playstyle and see what happens.
Wolfreading me for it is to be expected, I suppose. I hope it does not derail the thread. Although, at this stage, there is nothing to derail the thread from.
eyes narrow
eyes intensify
Or are you just a fool again sulit
That is all for now, will come back with a clearer mind and hopefully something more significant than an explanation of meta.
blinks
Alright I guess sulit is trying to have a staring contest
she lost
cries