[SFoL] SFoL 63 - Triple Threat: Virtuous - Game Over (4/26) - Blue Dragon (evils) win!

whats wolfy about pushing you in hopes to see how you respond early game it’s null more then anything

Totally not pocketing you or anything I like that mindset, for good and ill intended towards Unseen

They both need to get exterminated with e̵̮͊͜x̸̮͒̃̓͗̐t̴̗̫̀̃r̸̺̖͖̣͊͒̇͜ͅe̴̢̻̹̼̎͛͐͆̃m̶̛̒͛̍͗͝ͅe̸̢͌̊͝ ̸̜̘̤͈̃͆̍̇p̴̧̧͕̟̐r̴̰̜̦̎̆̓e̸͚̩̣̽͋̇͠j̸̢̠̹̫̿͛ȗ̴̦̞͓̯̣̦̈́̈́̾͘d̸͖͇̟̔͊̃ͅi̷͙̦͇̅̋́̒̕͠c̷̜̪͓̙̅̿͌̈́̓͜͠e̸̛̹͇̝̘̱̦̓͊͛̃̄,̴̬̪͔̰̼̊ ̵̢̬͙̦̄͋̒́Ả̶̡̘̹͚L̵̹̫̘͗̆̓͆̽̓L̷̩͖̘̱̺̊̃̌ ̵̘̦͚͙͜͝Ö̴͖̪F̷͍̭͉̫͔͌̎̅̾̀̈́ ̷̺̺̥̀̚͝T̶̥̺̜́̊̒H̷̲͎̺̮́Ê̵͔͑͌̃̀͊Ḿ̴̯͍͔͓̌ͅ

Also dont piss the wrong BD members or they bypass everything, ehh I would focus more on BD than HoB to be honest, more familiar with the setup than the latter team.

Okay I see, at least there has to be coming from, you guessed it, who was active within a hour ago

A town bleeding a town and townread as such, ah no I try at this again: Why would you assume that a strong townread must be bleed from a townie?

To my case I haven’t checked him entirely other than picking up his posts

There was a fake before in previous FoL29 but I digress, certainly SPK’d on bleed there if he’s making a strong case like TheBlueElixir, even though he’s voting trigger happy trying to boop inactives when it’s just a hour ago since it started, calm the F down man. We have execution at Day 1

Eeyup, no point speculating what Vulguard is

Also I stop bothering to vote read, what the fuck people.

meanwhile, a few posts ago

no ones asking for a actual lock lynch on you leafia

I wasn’t doing that until I started getting pushed and I’m just trying to get people to come to their senses. Also, you talk like meta reading is a bad thing.

Please dont use zalgo.

1 Like

The what? This glitchy thing?

1 Like

I need help. I was expecting havoc to follow this

Having this many votes on me so quickly still isn’t a good thing or a good feeling though, especially when the reasoning behind them is BS.

Lol.

It is when you state how you want to be given a meta read, openly saying “yeah I don’t do x” as scum doesn’t come across townie to me as if you are scum you can just play it off as “well I’m not doing x because I’m not scum” you are trying to control the reads on you instead of let players read you for your actions

Glad you notice it, I will take it seriously though - there’s little difference between them, the members will have similiar playstyles and mindsets, even though it differs their philosophy.

It’s not bs

your more hyper defensive them me

*then

:((((((((((((

I had to check the roles for this, and while I doubt that Vul is actually bleeding, I find it weird as to why you would think that bleeds are important. I’d understand it if it was the HoB, since (after looking up for any HoB role which can bleed, I found out that) only the Cabalist can bleed someone once per game, but when it comes to BD, I didn’t have to spend more than one minute to find out that the Alchemist can infinitely bleed people, although they’d have to wait until D5 before they are able to bleed people again.

Postscript:
Okay, apparently I didn’t think of the Heroine and the Champion, both of which can bleed people thrice a game. …I now see why you think that early bleeds are wasteful.

*than

thats the one thanks moleday

1 Like

I’m back to comment on the leading discussion.

While it looks like Leafia is following her pregame wolf behaviour. I don’t see anyone defending her.

I fail to see the joke and/or point. Chloe was voting Leafia… whom you townread.
Is this the reason why you had voted Chloe?