Actually FWIW if Alice is Visionary, then she could lie about getting bled and thereby make us think there is a Heroine on the loose.
It could somewhat explain why she didnāt want me to jail her? (I dunno. I am just seriously confused why I shouldnāt have jailed her N2 if she swapped her claim with Leafia.)
ā¦? If ash4fun is legit, then N.1 will die no matter what since bleeds go through DI, right?
FWIW if Mole isnāt Arbiter, then shooting Whysper is a must.
āactually, if Whsyper is Arbiter, then he would be DI.
Dunno about Visionary though. If Whysper is the Visionary, then:
I praise him for acting very well as a newbie by claiming Bureaucrat.
I pity him for getting occāed by Derps.
It was confirmed by Mole and Vul. ā¦wait, so Vul confirms Derpsā N1 occ because Vul didnāt get any feedback after using āMatchmakeā on N2?
ā¦hm? Something is off here. Mole is supposed to be last HoB (otherwise it is Whysper) so how would he know aboutā¦ wait. Is Arbiter!Moleās 3rd ability of āInside Seclusionā being used as an investigative ability? --is there even an ability like that in the first place?
Uhā¦ remind me why we are listening to Wazza when we are at L-1?
Itās fine. I need to catch up with the thread before I make my judgement first anyway.
āplus, I doubt I will change it even after catching up.
(Though you NEED to promise me that Magnus will use āIncarcerateā on ash4fun.)
I mentioned that as well, but finding the new Heroine is like finding a needle in a haystack.
So I gave up on offense and went for defense.
The Handmaiden claim? ā¦hey, why donāt we just have @N.1 and @Vulgard match their āMatchmakeā results? Since N.1 will die tonight anyway, we can get the info through Italy (albeit delayed) as to whether Vulās results was legit orā
It was at this point that I realized that scum!Vul can just lie and tell the truth (in the worst case scenario if both targets really were compatible).