[SFoL] SFoL 67: Last Stand of the Virtuous III - Endgame - The Unseen and The Senex are victorious!

Forum Matches Completed
#3819

Especially playing mobile games with ads.

#3820

and i wanted a wagon started for vca

#3821
LIKE THIS

I despise mobile

#3822

Correct on both.

#3823

Vca?

#3824

i havenā€™t read a single pkr post as i said i voted them to start a wagon quickly as the time for that was wasted on grand trial

#3825

vote count analysis
analysis based on the positions of playerā€™s votes

#3826

so offering a pkr wagon to certain people would give us info if someone wanted to make it a 3 man wagon etc. etc.

#3827

Thank you SCiri.

/unvote @EliThePsycho @Arctic

#3828

Siri

#3829

Votecount

Voted Voters Count
CoconutsTasteBad clonedcheese, Leafia, Wazza, Whysper, Bacon 5/9
Ciri Intensify 1/9
PKR Emilia, Ciri 2/9
Wazza CoconutsTasteBad 1/9
Not voting ATNoName, YoubutWorse, Gorta, PKR, Amelia, Aelin, GGhana

Ping eli & arctic if there is anything incorrect

#3830

Oh no, theyā€™re going to hate us for that.

#3831

I had a vote on coconut

#3832

And you can start a wagon on me as well?

That reasoning doesnā€™t feel well fleshed out.

#3833

coconut is top wagon?
iā€™m uncomfortable with that
i wouldnā€™t be able to say with confidence that they are town but i want a counterwagon
preferably on intensify

also @CoconutsTasteBad your wazza vote is never going to become a feasible wagon without a hunter gghana flip, you should create another cw

#3834

Ciri.

Youā€™re not making a lot of sense to me.

You say you wanted to vote PKR to start a wagon on them, yet Iā€™m youā€™re scumread and you couldā€™ve totally started a wagon on me, but you didnā€™tā€¦

And now you want a counterwagon on me??

#3835

Votecount amended

#3836

i mean i did and then considered that a 1 2 man wagon was a better move to make than 2 1 man wagons for, as i said, vca

#3837

But you did on a null slot and plus it was literally the start of the day (if you ignore GT).

So you literally couldā€™ve started a wagon on me, and yet you decided to vote someone with only 1 person voting them, even though you didnā€™t scumread them and you just wanted to ā€œstart a wagonā€

This logic also doesnā€™t make sense with your current logic.

Now you want to start a counterwagon on me, even though thereā€™s 5 people on Coconut??

#3838

okay youā€™re clearly just trying to refute my points without considering the logic at this point
i voted pkr because of a trick in the theatre (literally, i am not joking)
when you walk into a theatre, you are greeted by two vending machines. one is pepsi and the other is coke. the immediate question you tend to ask yourself is (this is psychologically proven) ā€œdo i want pepsi or coke?ā€ regardless of whether or not you are thirsty
if you donā€™t like pepsi youā€™d pick coke and vice versa right?
okay, now letā€™s say thereā€™s one vending machine. itā€™s coke.
the question you ask yourself is ā€œam i thirsty / do i want coke?ā€
now, if you donā€™t want coke, you look at other options.
turn this into the exact reason i voted pkr
if i voted intensify, i would give people the option of intensify or pkr and they would likely vote either of them even if itā€™s not their strongest read
this is absolutely terrible for vca
instead, i gave people the option of creating their own counterwagon so iā€™d be able to gain info on alignments from that, which, well, has led to a coconut wagon apparently
i need to backread to draw conclusions from this