like i said.
i tend to have different leaps in logic than most people, and how i view a situation, and the act on what i’ve viewed is also quite unusual
Even so. That is basically me saying that I am a “naturally scummy” player.
2 Likes
its abnormal, which doesnt necessarily mean sus
think about the places in which i’ve acted especially ‘weird’
exactly what about it seem sus, and why?
different leaps in logic, observations, and actions based on said observations
how does that translate to scummy
personally, i dont see my actions as sus, they seem normal to me, so i would like to know why they seem sus, so for future games i can try and throttle that
does that make sense at all? because, although it does to me, i think it might not to you
If you know why you are lying, your actions will be normal to you
I think you might be mad king because 1, why would you make threats to bd when they can easly vote you up? 2.saying that your going to side with bh if we lynch you, no one in there right mind would do that
my threats were only if they lynch me, so as to get them to not
and even so, i see a possibility that i think has a realistic chance of winning, that include me choosing a bd as my successor
Polik, no i dont get it, its quite vague, please explain it in more detail
Fires, fair, but what if i get a bd after saying and convincing you im choosing bh, then you’re only hurting yourself by lynching them. but, then again, i could always have actually picked a bh
theres no way you can tell, except to wait
oh i think i have an idea, one that you might not believe, but an idea nonetheless
even so, i can find out with another dead person
i will tell you my idea if you dont lynch me tomorrow or today
(tomorrow because thats the main day ive been planned to be lynched)
Interesting. This we might work with.
But we still need a lynch target.
Mind if you at least give us one?
if you do, then it will be bad for me to have told you
if you dont, then it will be a sign of good faith