Apprentice notes:
#313/#314/#321/#322/#327/#376 are all posts that shouldn’t exist, but are all bold for a wolf to write. If Apprentice is someone who plays scared/cautious as a wolf, I’d say these posts are >rand V for him. Otherwise, probably disregard them.
#332/#333 are earlygame reads, I don’t believe either are unique in the context of the thread, but actually having presence is notable.
#357 is sort of similar to how I felt when reading the referenced post, so them being on the same wavelength as me is a decent look for them
#559/#560/#563 is also a decent look, I don’t fully agree with how “weird” Apprentice thinks this is but I also don’t think this is an easy push for a wolf to make this early when there’s no D1 Lynch
Conclusion: Apprentice was decently villagery before Emilia replaced into the slot.
Emilia notes:
#1357/#1358 is a pretty immediate jumpstart from their first post -> having opinions, which is notable. Reasoning seems to be meta-driven so I have no opinion on the validity of it.
Lots of posts around here that aren’t strictly AI, but are generally good. #1372 is a good example of this. This post is a good post for town to have in thread; but it’s not hard for a wolf to write for towncred.
Interesting interaction with Wazza, (~#1430) jumping to “jester play?” is… a weird conclusion?
#1454/1456 are okay, but are more bouncing thoughts off of other people than their own unique thoughts, and they don’t really make it clear whether or not they agree with the thoughts they’re echoing.
#1610(hehe)/#1674 is similar to how I read #1372: Good post, but not hard to write as a wolf.
#1636 aren’t unique thoughts but shows that they still believe their early read in #1357. This on it’s own isn’t super notable, but the opposite would be notable given the short timeframe.
Kinda like that in #2210, Emilia responds to gorta about Blizer despite not being pinged, in Cult/Unseen!Blizer worlds I’d say this is a post that is unlikely to be W/W – they carry on explaining why they disliked Blizers posting in their following posts and the thoughts aren’t super high level but are valid
Oh, they explain the Jester read in #2533/#2539, I don’t agree with it but I’m happy they elaborated on it, the thought process makes some sense and I think the “scum trying to play the idc card” thought is actually a good one.
#2591 is slightly amusing to me, as their ISO reeks of a player who primarily uses meta to read players, but when they’re called out for allegedly playing out of meta, they ask why it’s AI. I’m not too sure if this is out of meta for Emilia, but their posting so far has seemed decent.
#2667 feels somewhat objective/unbiased, as I kind of agree with most of her conclusions here.
#3002 feels kind of forced when they have to elaborate that they both do not make readlists generally and think their own readlist is bad. This post, and post #3011 reinforces my assumption that Emilia primarily reads players off of meta, which means the paranoia on my slot+highway seems consistent with their thought process, although not at all unfakable.
Bunch of mechanical stuff here.
#3186/3189 show them reconsidering their read on both myself and Wazza, which is an okay look.
Conclusion: I don’t think Emilia is quite as villagery as Apprentice was, most of their “good” posts are easily posts wolves can write for towncred since they’re objective posts, not subjective. GTH, I’d say Emilia is >rand V – but I think Apprentice was more villagery. I do remember seeing a few posts stating that Emilia posting this much content is a good look for them, but I’m disregarding those because I think that’s a shitty tell in terms of meta (and it didn’t seem echoed nearly as much as the metaread on Mode)
I’m too tired to skim the other two slots I wanted to, this took even longer than doing Ryan, so I’ll probably just do those two in Allies chat tonight and put my full readlist in my logs, which would give me time to reevaluate more slots, as I was only planning on reevaluating the slots I hadn’t remembered much from.