We’ll just need to work on narrowing it down sooner from now on
Once we get to 2 or so we can focus questions
We’ll just need to work on narrowing it down sooner from now on
Once we get to 2 or so we can focus questions
and the roles just muck it up
Ok Simon but let’s be real
Literal questions can be good too
get down to 2 what?
no players are lynched or anything like that
yeah but not just literal questions
and when not literal questions are answered in character, the answers are no longer reliable pretty much at all
Roles don’t muck
Anything up. I haven’t followed mine but yet managed to do it
As a person riding the bus
you’d answer window 100% of the time
yeah im asking to have the ability to ask a question out of character
that supports my request, not count against it
(in reply to fire)
By the end there I knew for sure you, me, and Noz were alright
2 were left
We now know what to look for in a non-helpful role vs a Spy
idgi
how was i not hung after this
honestly, i think i wouldnt have gone for window
if im playing the game that is
I thought that was dumb as fuck
But
Twilight still had less
but if i have to answer in character, id be forced to answer window, because yeah, if i was on a bus id say window,
You have to answer in role though
your role isn’t FoL / ToL symbology expert, it’d be something like driver or passenger
And we do so gg
but im not on a bus
THATS WHY NOT ALL QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED IN CHARACTER, AS QUESTIONS SIMILAR TO THAT (if a bit more cohesive) SHOULD BE POSSIBLE TO ASK WHILE GETTING A COHERENT/CONSISTENT ANSWER
NOT NONE OF THEM, NOT ALL OF THEM
IM ONLY ASKING TO MAKE IT OPTIONAL ON THE ASKER, NOT FORCED ONE WAY OR THE OTHER
No, all questions must be answered from your perspective, based on your role otherwise what’s the point?
For example, if the place was jail and the question asked was ‘Do you feel safe here?’ A guard, inmate and warden would have three very different answers.