Sellsword and…?
Now
Assuming this is replacing inq
Would it need to be adjusted to be able to townside less easily (given that faction trial is a very potent BD-siding ability)
The only issue with Fool is the penalty not cooperating with the current meta, also off-topic 
except you need the BD you find to die and once you use it once you cant faction check anymore
disagree but offtopic
Probably would need an adjustment, like “can’t use the same sentence 2 nights in a row” assuming it fails or something, but that’s balance and I’m too tired for this.
I think Class Type / Visit are good ones
Difficult design block since you need to have a third one and Faction is very townsided
There’s three ways in my mind you can take it from here:
- have faction base it off starting faction (that’s saved in the game’s data so it shouldn’t be hard)
- have the feedback from correct / incorrect guess happen later
- leave as is
also
would you pick from
BD
Neutral
Cult
Unseen
or
BD
Neutral
Unseen/Cult
i feel like the meta for this class is gonna be
n1: faction check BD
n2/n3: visit knight/chrono/phys to prince, or phys/alch to bleeder if possible, else just some random claimer as what they claim
if you greenpeek somebody
odds are they are going to be converted or die sooner rather than later
so lets think
in a 16p
excluding self and king, so 14
you have…
2-3 other neuts (including NK)
2 cultseen
10-9 BD
in an absolute worst case scenario you have a 64% (9/14) chance of finding a BD n1
in this current meta i think this class gets all 3 of its targets by N4 almost every game
i know part of the design of this class is to discourage the current meta but i doubt that’ll happen without cultseen/NK getting some buffs
in a longer game i think this class will have a pretty high winrate
do you have to survive
thought so, but wanted to double check
this class feels like a slightly scum-sided alch from what i’m seeing in my generated scenarios in my head
