Just because you don’t like a certain playstyle, doesn’t mean that somebody else won’t. Neutral king was one of its kind and I didn’t think it had to be removed.
No, Pretender actually doesn’t start as King so can become King when BD can’t afford to kill them.
But none of them are ‘You lose the game’
Give neutral king a hide and a 1-shot self-heal ability then. That solves reap and butler poison.
Previous win rates of starting neutral king proves this statement wrong anyways.
That was before the Whisper King meta, when the King became a valuable target for the NK to kill, and possibly unseen/cult. Also before Pretender was a thing too.
There is no reason the meta wouldn’t shift again as well if king chances were adjusted to include neutral.
Also there has totally been a whisper king meta back when neutral starting king was a thing.
but they aren’t… any other kind of king has the potential to die, but make huge strides to their win condition before going down and hope the survivors can carry the ball.
Have you really been effective if you get n2 reaped? Poisoned and being executed for being evil you should have under control by looking BD enough.
Wow, seems neutral king is more controversial than I thought. Maybe I add more options to side with NK? This being: (Warning: loose suggestions)
Passive (Royal Bond) - The neutral killer will know you are a neutral king as soon as the game begins.
Win Condition: Survive OR have the neutral killer win
So this way it plays alot different than gk and ek, because it has options
Also this might raise nk winrate a little
Idk lol
Neutral Kings are iffy because Kingmakers like Alch are already an iffy concept and having them be impossible to mechanically find just makes them unfair to everyone involved. And making neutral King confirmable goes against the point of King
Also, there’s the thing that even if the NK knows the king is neutral, it still can’t rely on them helping them anyway.
And Neutral King starting is fun for nobody
It sucks for them and it sucks for everybody else
Why? Clearly the existence of this thread proves that some people like Neutral king.
Alch is more fun then neutral king.
He isn’t targeted by reapers (sometimes) or butlers or randomly executed on D2 when people think you are EK
The real problem with this suggestion that seems to have been strangely unnoticed (or maybe I’m blind and someone posted about it already lol) is that is has allies. I don’t want to go back to the dark place of allies meta :^)
Not how the only people arguing for starting neutral King are the ones who haven’t experienced it.
I am aware but didn’t comment because there is a more fundamental issue
Wait what? No.