I was on my phone while in a fluids lab while posting that defense so it was bungled on several different fronts
that’s why i pledged never to post on this website with my crap asus phone again
I was on my phone while in a fluids lab while posting that defense so it was bungled on several different fronts
that’s why i pledged never to post on this website with my crap asus phone again
and why i now take my laptop most places when i didn’t before
So the reason wasn’t because you posted defense but because you posted bad defense due to circumstances you were in?
There’s a difference between posting a bad defense due to circumstance and being asked to provide defense in a way that can be considered bait and no matter what way you answer it, it hurts you
I consider myself to have been a victim of the latter much more than the former (the latter happened that same game, in fact, when I was tunneled by another townie for using the word omniscience on a coincidence)
If I consider a post asking me for some kind of defense to be bait, which at this point I do most of the time, I won’t waste time responding that I could spend on offense
Wdym by bait
Do you mean that it’s constructed in such way to give certain result
Or you know that it will go towards certain results because you do not think you can give good enough answer?
constructed in such a way that the question will hurt the target no matter what answer is provided, no matter if the asker intends such or not
a great example was me going back and forth with the person accusing me of being evil off of the omniscience coincidence over and over again
it went nowhere, wasted my time, and hurt me
that’s what i consider bait
Why do you think my read on you is a bait?
As of now, i consider most inquiries for defense to be bait even if that wasn’t the intention, so I rarely respond
that’s not what i said
i said that your question asking me for a defense was bait, whether you intended it to be or not
an inquiry for defense is different from a read
please stop talking to me so I can spend some time meta-analyzing italy. thanks. I’ll respond to one more post and then I will ignore you for the next several hours
Yes but you didn’t answer my read Wich means that you consider it a bait
I mean you could not give defense to all reads but then why the bait argument?
what was the supporting evidence of your read of me? If you have any, i did not see it.
I do not respond to reads alone, but I do respond to the foundation of reads.
So if you thought that my read lacked supporting evidence you could have answered with that as defense?
No
I assumed you probably had evidence, i just haven’t noticed it yet