Like what you try to sell rn is that mafia blocked Ti claim AND they still no actioned becouse being scared of lookout?
It could also be that Capo did do the kill, but they have a disguiser who swapped Capo with Arete
the disguiser wouldāve been seen
How?
This doesnāt add up in one place too.
So you say there is:
- Katze did the kill
- Disguiser swapped Capo and Arete
- Prankster faked the Bep message
We lack mafia support, so obvious choice would be Cheese is consort.
However, why would they use disguiser (who sheriff is unaffected by and block possible lookout/invest, rather than block sheriff and hope that disguiser would affect lookout/invest.
Likeā¦ that way disguiser is useless.
They left sheriff who can bypass it in open.
They blocked person who was most likely affected by it.
That doesnāt add up.
It would add up if we had an incompetent scumteam.
So that scenario pretty much scales down to Cheese being town, which is also in the above equation.
Aka itās not different from the above one.
Katze tho.
And why does Bep have to be telling the truth
He doesnāt.
Itās also in conclusion.
My conclusion is correct.
Altho I highly believe he is telling truth.
Bep is Witch signaling to Mafia?
Still my conclusion is correct in that case
So Bep doesnāt matter whether they are lying or not?
It does, it was noted in the conclusion.
Did you even read it?
Like it really has it noted there.
Do you want me to break it down for cases now?
If bep was lying, then how could you come up to the same conclusion?
Jakeā¦ take my advice and donāt study math or programming.
Subject:
A = m-Arshal
B = Bep
C = Cheese
If:
A = Town
B = Town
Then:
C = Town
If:
C = Evil
B = Town
Then:
A = Evil
If:
A = Town
C = Evil
Then:
B = Evil