ToS2399 - ɢᴀᴍᴇ ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ - ɢᴀᴍᴇ ᴏᴠᴇʀ [ᴍᴀꜰɪᴀ ᴡɪɴꜱ] - ᴀᴡ ꜱʜɪᴛ, ʜᴇʀᴇ ᴡᴇ ɢᴏ ᴀɢᴀɪɴ

Forum Matches Completed
#5076

im not quoting the rest

#5077

i remember eevee specifically raising aretes rumor value a lot

#5078

yeah

that’s how I threw the. duel

by raising arete’s rumor a ton

#5079

guys correct me if I’m wrong but could we be in mylo and not lylo?

#5080

like the post says correctly, not scum or evil faction

#5081
#5082

that’s the definition of lylo

#5083

my card doesn’t mention rumor ?? right

none of the flipped ones are like talking about it

#5084

then whats the definition of mylo, all im saying is we are in one of the los but the way ici describes it it could be either

#5085

According to rules you are unaware of, this ability may fail for no apparent reason

WAIT

IS THIS POSSIBLE

TO DO WITH IT

#5086

i dont remember if you get an actual noticeable buff

i assume so

i dont think it actually exists??

idk

#5087

thats pretty clearly lylo imo
lack of a lynch =/= a correct lynch
if it said ‘if the town lynch incorrectly today, they will lose’ then we would be in mylo

#5088

wait no
it like
it probably exists if this is the case

that wording make sense
with rumor being
exist

MMMMM

#5089

which one of you fools is going to end this with a snapvote even though we repeatedly tell you not to

#5090

why not?

im not advocating for a no lynch here, but ur argument is not solid

it says that actually. remove do not but want to convey the same message, u would change it to incorrectly. If we are using grammar as an argument use it right

#5091

does anyone else have
something like this on their card

#5092

I have a redacted passive

#5093

but that might be related to IC stuff

#5094

no it doesnt.
thats the point im making.
the two statements are logically distinct.
a correct lynch means a lynch where scum is targeted. if no lynch happens then a correct lynch did not happen. neither did an incorrect lynch happen. because no lynch happened.

#5095

i have something odd like that let me grab it