Or if min was redchecked, we’d know that either rb’d, or wolf that can attack or roleblocker
Considering Squirrel’s response, I doubt she was bluffing with the MDet claim, though I believe she was bluffing a red check.
Otherwise she wouldn’t have to clear min as town.
nuclear has a “redcheck”, meaning they saw something unnatural = they saw movement
and they were on min, but min didn’t claim a role that can move
so
- they were RB’ed
- they are exactly scum
wait no (1) still exists so that’s not really a redcheck
/unvote
squirrel come baaaaack
idk
lynch wolf now, think later
doubt it waa fakeclaim
This seems like an obv!scum response. 
What kind of town tunnels one suspect before going for another tunnel subject?
…oh wait. @Clownzu, could you talk with City and give me your opinion?
1 Like
Noticeably, they didn’t include the results of their actions when cloned asked
2 Likes
thats most town
Tunneling just gives an excuse for scum to wash their hands off a bad exe if it succeeds, and it is also an excuse to ignore the main wagons if it fails. It’s never a good move, and town should simply avoid such actions.
i think it’s possible to have faked the “oh well idk what nuclear has claimed so here they are”
so basically we’re again at square one, with no guarantees squirrel is actually MD 
No. It really is RNG, i.e. random.
Sure, you can interpret it as “luck” if you happen to tunnel a wolf as town, but if a wolf tunnels, then they can just use their tunneling behavior as excuse for whoever they were tunneling.
It removes the “social deduction” aspect of forum mafia, and retrogrades this game into primitive RNG.
If Squirrel faked MDet, then why did he claim N1 on Pigeon and N2 on min? Wouldn’t he have to read through -at the very least- Nuclear’s ISO to do that?
