[VFM] JoaT^2 - (6/15) - šŸ˜¹ Pirates (Town) Win!

@sulit
what do you think of the read list that was pointed out by Ash? from Mole

also if anyone as town or mafia games from Mole, that would be great to read once I get back, gotta help my mother for a little bit

tbh I havenā€™t really been paying attention to sulit.

like Iā€™m still not sure I like how they handled that vote but ig it makes a bit more sense now.

I still donā€™t think itā€™s fair to compare d3 reads that have been confirmed by flips to d1 reads, and afaik Iā€™m not undercutting previous posts. But I guess the vote makes a bit more sense.

@Moleland

Can you please substantiate your vote on Wisp more? Some quotes would be helpful. Iā€™m not seeing what youā€™re seeing in their posts thus far.

I quite like Sulitā€™s posting even though a lot of posts are very wasteful. I could see where literally all their takes were coming from to be honest.

Except Gorta, who I should still read as well, since they finally popped up!

can you point out these posts

oh

i assume youā€™re talking about post #310 here, so iā€™ll clarify a bit on what i was thinking when i wrote that post

the fact that he was changing his read on me specifically was coincidental (but it certainly made it easier to notice)

i found his thought process slightly unnatural because he did a complete 180 all because i asked him to elaborate on his read on me

which isnā€™t a very AI post imo, do you disagree?

i take more pride in being hard to read than i should tbh

which has been an issue in past games

(for clarification, every quoted person in the above dropdown box was town)

for what its worth i jotted down my thoughts on people and wasnā€™t fully intending on turning it into a readlist (or writing on every player) but then i wrote about everybody and figured iā€™d put it all in an easier to read format

I mean, I would have to get the context, and read it heavily, and probably donā€™t want to focus on that 1 hour before EoD. But even if I didnā€™t see it, I would be far more interested in vulgardā€™s thought process and if he thought the post was AI and why. Even if I think a read is faulty, itā€™s important to understand why they had that read and if their mindset made sense. Did you ask him why he turned around so fast, or did you just say that the 180 was scummy?

you can jump to the posts and read yourself but this should give you a decent bit of context

ā€¦ all the reads indicate a townread. You clearly did not read their readlist. Can you please be a bit more active? Youā€™re doing a disservice to whatever team youā€™d be on.

@an_gorta_pratai it would help if you voted too then! I think itā€™s good to bring up this point again, regardless of how I could see both alignments do this.

I dislike that they finished off with this conditional, but they do quite immediately make their stance fairly clear

oh wait nvm, itā€™s another conditional.

I think more players could use this advice to give more context.

This is so LAMIST, considering they mentioned earlier they just wanted to fulfill the 20 post quota. Who sincerely believes an_gorta is going to go through those games?

Please be more specific then. Who are these experienced players that are scum?

I am fairly conflicted on this slot. An_gorta really has a lotā€¦ of traditionally towny things to say. A few, I could find fake and posturing, but they have so many differently angled traditionally towny things. I will say that overall this slot is null scum still.

I mean, it was only 250 posts in. It is a meta read so I canā€™t say I love it, but I donā€™t think thereā€™s anything wrong with him reversing an early read because he saw a post or series of posts from you that he found villagery. Just because those happened to be posts questioning the wolf read doesnā€™t make that more valid.

I might be giving him the benefit of the doubt, but I can see him doing this as town.

But I find my thoughts on this to be unimportant. I want you to elaborate a little more on what you were thinking in this instance.

Why exactly did you think it was more likely to be from mafia, and how do your posts reflect you handling the situation with that mindset. I believe you are capable of casing yourself and I want you to run me through exactly what you were thinking in that instance.

1 Like

I think I mostly agree with you about gorta. Having a lot of ā€œbut then again maybe notā€ phrases is nagl.

On the fake townieness, itā€™s possible that:

is a non-scum motivation for that imo.

I am doing a very very fast catch-up. I cannot say how long I will be available.

I have still not gotten a notification that you quoted or mentioned me. Curious about your thoughts on my slot. It has been two hours.

I dislike this unvote. They seemed rather confident in the vote earlier in the day. They didnā€™t unvote because they dislike the wagon, or because they found a new wagon to go on.
We have time until the end of the day. Why canā€™t Flameo stay on ash while they read over others?

I do not want to pre-flip, but I do not like the feeling this gives me.

Derps going back through old games to show that CatLover was cherry-picking is a good look.


Ashā€™s wall on Mole seems to have a conclusion in mind beforehand. Which I do not like.
I will be staying here


1 Like

yes. The conclusion I made when I first read their iso yesterday.

image

Sorry, I am just feeling very meme-y today! I will say however that the fact that you are saying that you came to a conclusion before explaining why makes me think that the wall was not a genuine attempt at solving but instead a wall just trying to push a read.

I feel like your iso lacks a large amount of genuine solving and feels more like you are just trying to push the game in 1 direction or the other.

1 Like

I mean the conclusion that we should vote Mole.

You quoted places that you did not think gave him a bad look, and yet your conclusion was that we should vote him anyways. It feels like self preservation hidden as a read.

This argument is moot.

This implies you dont think its wolfy

This does not seem to be alignment indicative, as you do not take a solid stance on it.

Bolded = you said this lines up with his thought process. Implying it is not wolfy. This should not be in your conclusion.

It isnt consistent.

Is it self-preservation?

What I am trying to say is that I donā€™t believe that you believe in this read.

Going into an Isolation-dive with a conclusion in mind beforehand shows that you are not open to re-evaluation.

idk if it affects how you see the wall, but most of the points I made, were thoughts I had when I made their entry in the readslist.

The ā€œno agendaā€ bit was something I only found the second time tho.

So at that point in time, youā€™re right that I wasnā€™t really solving mole but rather expounding on my previous findings.

:joy_cat:

i can try

nyoom

iā€™ll italicize what i remember of my thought process

why does vulgard think my entrance was slow? i dont think it was slow :thinking:

interesting, i havenā€™t really written anything since that initial read though?

maybe he just reread my entrance?

but all i did was ask him to clarify on a thought why does that change his mind

i think my thought process is very transparent in the above posts though

i feel like youā€™re missing an important part of the interaction though

at the end of it i didnā€™t scumread him

i thought those specific posts were odd but i thought the rest of his posts were fine

when vulgard is a wolf i usually hate almost all of his posts, especially his entrances and when heā€™s under pressure

You are right, I missed that. I no longer think that it was self-TMI into agenda because you werenā€™t using it for a serious push on vul. Still do not know what to make of you, but this conversation has been good, thank you for helping clear that up for me! :heart_eyes_cat:

Vote Count

Vote Target Voted by Votes
Wiisp Moleland 1/8
Moleland CallMeIo, Vulgard, ash4fun, Wiisp 4/8
ash4fun CatLover, Elephas, Sulit 3/8
CallMeIo katze, Wazza, Leafia 3/8
Catlover SirDerpsAlot 1/8
katze centuries 1/8

@ me for any mistakes or future votes

1 Like