[VFM] JoaT^2 - (6/15) - šŸ˜¹ Pirates (Town) Win!

you can jump to the posts and read yourself but this should give you a decent bit of context

ā€¦ all the reads indicate a townread. You clearly did not read their readlist. Can you please be a bit more active? Youā€™re doing a disservice to whatever team youā€™d be on.

@an_gorta_pratai it would help if you voted too then! I think itā€™s good to bring up this point again, regardless of how I could see both alignments do this.

I dislike that they finished off with this conditional, but they do quite immediately make their stance fairly clear

oh wait nvm, itā€™s another conditional.

I think more players could use this advice to give more context.

This is so LAMIST, considering they mentioned earlier they just wanted to fulfill the 20 post quota. Who sincerely believes an_gorta is going to go through those games?

Please be more specific then. Who are these experienced players that are scum?

I am fairly conflicted on this slot. An_gorta really has a lotā€¦ of traditionally towny things to say. A few, I could find fake and posturing, but they have so many differently angled traditionally towny things. I will say that overall this slot is null scum still.

I mean, it was only 250 posts in. It is a meta read so I canā€™t say I love it, but I donā€™t think thereā€™s anything wrong with him reversing an early read because he saw a post or series of posts from you that he found villagery. Just because those happened to be posts questioning the wolf read doesnā€™t make that more valid.

I might be giving him the benefit of the doubt, but I can see him doing this as town.

But I find my thoughts on this to be unimportant. I want you to elaborate a little more on what you were thinking in this instance.

Why exactly did you think it was more likely to be from mafia, and how do your posts reflect you handling the situation with that mindset. I believe you are capable of casing yourself and I want you to run me through exactly what you were thinking in that instance.

1 Like

I think I mostly agree with you about gorta. Having a lot of ā€œbut then again maybe notā€ phrases is nagl.

On the fake townieness, itā€™s possible that:

is a non-scum motivation for that imo.

I am doing a very very fast catch-up. I cannot say how long I will be available.

I have still not gotten a notification that you quoted or mentioned me. Curious about your thoughts on my slot. It has been two hours.

I dislike this unvote. They seemed rather confident in the vote earlier in the day. They didnā€™t unvote because they dislike the wagon, or because they found a new wagon to go on.
We have time until the end of the day. Why canā€™t Flameo stay on ash while they read over others?

I do not want to pre-flip, but I do not like the feeling this gives me.

Derps going back through old games to show that CatLover was cherry-picking is a good look.


Ashā€™s wall on Mole seems to have a conclusion in mind beforehand. Which I do not like.
I will be staying here


1 Like

yes. The conclusion I made when I first read their iso yesterday.

image

Sorry, I am just feeling very meme-y today! I will say however that the fact that you are saying that you came to a conclusion before explaining why makes me think that the wall was not a genuine attempt at solving but instead a wall just trying to push a read.

I feel like your iso lacks a large amount of genuine solving and feels more like you are just trying to push the game in 1 direction or the other.

1 Like

I mean the conclusion that we should vote Mole.

You quoted places that you did not think gave him a bad look, and yet your conclusion was that we should vote him anyways. It feels like self preservation hidden as a read.

This argument is moot.

This implies you dont think its wolfy

This does not seem to be alignment indicative, as you do not take a solid stance on it.

Bolded = you said this lines up with his thought process. Implying it is not wolfy. This should not be in your conclusion.

It isnt consistent.

Is it self-preservation?

What I am trying to say is that I donā€™t believe that you believe in this read.

Going into an Isolation-dive with a conclusion in mind beforehand shows that you are not open to re-evaluation.

idk if it affects how you see the wall, but most of the points I made, were thoughts I had when I made their entry in the readslist.

The ā€œno agendaā€ bit was something I only found the second time tho.

So at that point in time, youā€™re right that I wasnā€™t really solving mole but rather expounding on my previous findings.

:joy_cat:

i can try

nyoom

iā€™ll italicize what i remember of my thought process

why does vulgard think my entrance was slow? i dont think it was slow :thinking:

interesting, i havenā€™t really written anything since that initial read though?

maybe he just reread my entrance?

but all i did was ask him to clarify on a thought why does that change his mind

i think my thought process is very transparent in the above posts though

i feel like youā€™re missing an important part of the interaction though

at the end of it i didnā€™t scumread him

i thought those specific posts were odd but i thought the rest of his posts were fine

when vulgard is a wolf i usually hate almost all of his posts, especially his entrances and when heā€™s under pressure

You are right, I missed that. I no longer think that it was self-TMI into agenda because you werenā€™t using it for a serious push on vul. Still do not know what to make of you, but this conversation has been good, thank you for helping clear that up for me! :heart_eyes_cat:

Vote Count

Vote Target Voted by Votes
Wiisp Moleland 1/8
Moleland CallMeIo, Vulgard, ash4fun, Wiisp 4/8
ash4fun CatLover, Elephas, Sulit 3/8
CallMeIo katze, Wazza, Leafia 3/8
Catlover SirDerpsAlot 1/8
katze centuries 1/8

@ me for any mistakes or future votes

1 Like

not really. I suppose I didnā€™t say it right there but I did consider meganulls somewhat wolfy. The consistency bit pushes it back T a little, but not enough to overrule the meganulls.

As for the posts I quoted, I quoted ones that I thought were strongly AI and ones that I thought were ā€œimportantā€ for one reason or another (ie. readslists). So yeah the nullreads argument is weaker than the others.

ik I just couldnā€™t be bothered to delete it.

This is a fairly good look for Leafia because she is usually indecisive as hell when it comes to things here

I will have to reread those later if you survive

I would rather vote to no execute or vote a vanity wagon before I voted mole and voting any other wagon just balances it and puts it in the hands of mafia

I wanted to fill that quota so that I donā€™t get replaced out, but that doesnā€™t mean I am not trying to solve

I have to go. I apologize.

Use your brains and be smart.

I can not say iā€™m a very big fan of an_gortaā€™s prodging and refusal to vote at EoD. Not casting a vote is anti-town and if wagons are TvT then itā€™s an even worse look. That EoD post and general ISO really worries me.

Just looked, I guess it didnā€™t get deleted : D. Only locked and removed from homescreen.

Scumgame:

1 Like

Unexplainable early townread = pocketing

I am confused why this would be the more tentative townread in this post, but I agree with this point, so thatā€™s nice.

Could you please quote that for me? I have the feeling you sometimes make up points. I will take this back fully if you supply me with that.

I dislike the

in this vote, their first vote nonetheless. Talk about settling in the thread.

This post has been discussed in full already, so reread some earlier posts of me to get points on this again, but the most important point is that calling someone that you donā€™t know LHF after 5 short posts and basing another playerā€™s interaction with that as LHF as a scumread is very weird.

Fair point

This is an extreme townread and Katze did not deserve such a read from my viewpoint at this time. However I donā€™t have meta information and these seem to know each other well. The fact that Katze doesnā€™t go along with it say something though.

So many townreadsā€¦

I dislike heavily how Vulgard throws out townreads like itā€™s Christmas and heā€™s Santa Claus.

This is a funny coincidence that they are posted in orderā€¦ funny?

Oh, pardon me, you also townread me. How foolish of me. Note that up until this whole ISO, Vulgard has only called me and Moleland in a bad light. With Moleland only being slightly underwhelmingā€¦ and after I push back on them, they divert to Mole moreā€¦

Can I get more townreads?

Itā€™s not even funny. PLEASE, I implore you, to do this yourself and read the sheer amount of townreads Vulgard gives around and almost no scumreads. Itā€™s unbelieveable to the max.

After Ash has been getting some votes, they suddenly feel comfortable going after someone else too, but only by adding several conditionals.

Based on your earlier posts, it seems to suggest that this leaves out some players that you called town. :slight_smile:

I will admit that these detract from my earlier points a little.

ā€¦ This might sound mean, but does this player have an inferiority complex or something? Heā€™s weakening his own reads againā€¦

That is a consistent trend throughout their ISO at least.

Another hedge and I think dismissing me as a sidelined villager is a weird take when you are actively sidestepping responding to me in full.

Donā€™t you worry.

I think this apparent frustration is undeserved in the way players have been posting in this game.

Ironically, I think pushing on the LHF is now a more valid take with Vulgard on Io here than when it was used against me, but Iā€™ll admit to have a blind spot on Io, because they didnā€™t go along with easily scumreading me, when I think two separate players were and they were prompting him.


I notice now, itā€™s almost EoD, so Iā€™ll cut this short and pick it up later. From going through these posts more in full. I think Vulgard deserves a lot more scrutiny and Iā€™m definitely reading him as scummier still.

If we arenā€™t CFDā€™ing I am not voting because I will not vote my top town read