Thatās fine.
I just donāt believe he should be the elimination for today.
Sequence of events:
- I make two gut reads with some reasoning
- I tell CatLover they will be first for me to read
- CatLover points out contradiction with above
- I explain that the first two ādonāt countā for the purpose of first read
- people misunderstand
- I further explain that I try do an in-depth read on everyone D1, and he would be first of that.
Notice that at no point do I actually intentionally say that the two gut reads are worthless or bad, at least not more than any read at that stage in the game can be.
I said Iād hate it if someone was doing what people thought I was doing, which in fact I was not doing.
Letās try again:
I was not trying to cancel my previous posts.
People thought I was trying to cancel my previous posts.
I woulnāt like it if someone actually were trying to cancel their previous posts.
comprende?
yes, thank you for clearing that up
do it
that is fair
how do you know how many nullreads i have or donāt have when iāve only publicly expressed my opinion on like three players
because you havenāt expressed your opinion on everyone but like three players
anyone*
anyways it is now sleep time for me
Iāll probably get to isos and stuff around 1 tomorrow maybe
cya!
you got me there
i donāt have too many reads as ive been kind of occupied irl for personal things
and i wasnt planning on going super high effort this game anyway
ill probably have more before EoD since it looks like everybodys posted a bit
except gorta with their 1 post
ok u get a pass but if day 2 you do nothing big trouble
i dont want a pass because thatāll just encourage me to be lazier than i already am :^)
after i sleep ill probably reread everything and see where i am
explain to me, how your vote ended up on Moleland here?
Sure.
This is a rather serious accusation. From my understanding, a chainsaw defense implies both players are scum, no? A scum lean doesnāt seem to add up with this. Please expand on this thought process.
I voted Moleland to receive a response to this question. I would have voted Vulgard but he mentioned he was leaving the thread, so I placed him in my FoS group. Those under the āfinger of suspicionā are people I suspect, but am not voting. Hence why Mole is not listed there.
I dont feel like quoting the second post as well, but exactly why are you waiting for Ash to give you content that makes you believe they are townie, when your first wall effectively had a list of 3 people you would vote, me/Vul/Mojo
Because they did not respond to my questions, when they were very clearly present in the thread. I voted them and re-sent the questions, with a ping. I donāt see an issue with this.
Why does Vul not being there, mean you shouldnt vote them, if you hate them the most?
At this point in the game I vote for reactions, as well as incentive to respond to questions. Vulgard stated he was āgoing to sleepā so I would rather not wasteā¦ 8+ hours on a train that will not yield any results. I have better things to do with my time.
Your read of Mole didnāt even change from your change of vote
Indeed it did not. Is there a problem with that? I got a response, and I asked another question.
Your words and votes do not line up, I think its all fake
My votes line up perfectly with my thoughts. I hope my explanations above show you this.
So if I hadnāt made it clear, those were my reads based off skimming the first 100 posts. Iām not sure why you think itās impossible for me to miss catloverās early game when I saw yours. I still need to read back but you had posted much more recently and were being actively discussed when I got on. Perhaps you are right in that it would be more likely for me to see catlover and miss you, but Iām not sure that it says anything that the opposite occured
This response has a genuine feel, and makes logical sense - I do understand subconsciously paying more attention to players that posted more recently. I also do think it is hypocritical of me to call you out for not seeing Catās early-game posts, when I missed sulitās vote on Leafia at the start of this game.
I will, however, be staying here until I see your analysis on the āisominiwalls,ā or at least until I find a better place to park.
do i have to
id rather just relax and vibe read posts as they come
Nonchalant attitude. I do like that katze is not forcing reads when prompted. Natural progression is always better than creating a case out of thin air.
The only one we are missing so far is Gorta right?
Indeed.
Hm. Looking at the āFrequent Postersā section is interesting. I feel like I have done a lot more than the postcount shows. Twenty-four posts in comparison to Leafiaās ninety-eight is quite a big difference.
What is the average postcount for a game like this? It already feels high.
Day 1 or Grand Total?
I was mostly curious about an average 48-hour day on this site. We are ~10 hours into the day, and at ~600 posts. At this rate we will be atā¦ near 2500 at the end of this day. That seems very high. This is normal?
This site is known to have high activity.
This is very normal.
Canāt sleep and this list seems reasonable to me. I have to admit that Wiisp has been improvingving a bit and Iām starting th o wonder if I was misguided in calling them scum. As for yet targets, I donāt really have anyone that I think would make a good one yet, although I donāt exactly hate the thought of a Mole yet. If I had a GTH and had to pick a yeet target right now, it would be him.