Conformation bias and overconfidence in my reads
I think your push is very silly at this point! This is an argument that, in essence, boils down to “do I read every post of the thread when trying to read, or not”. This is not an argument that can be proved in any way, and I will no longer argue with such an injudicious case! This is boiling down to a “he said, she said” and it is very silly to me that you think this is in any way good evidence!
I feel like this is the basis for a majority of your reads.
I don’t know how to have conversation with you and attempt to change your mind if you cannot back up reads with quotes and evidence.
I implore you to attempt.
Also, if you do not like my posts today, you will probably disagree with my NKA. Please feel free to do your own.
Even if you didn’t cherry pick that dosent change the fact I think it was agenda lol
What about it made it more likely to be mafia agenda and not a genuine case! You cannot just say “agenda” and expect your problems to be solved!
I mean I already gave my opinion on NKA
I just don’t think it’s incredibly usefull D2
Agree to disagree.
“Agenda”
Scumreading someone because you thought them using the second person in a case was a pocket attemp was just straight bad and I can’t bring myself to belive that it was real
That only acted a supplement to my case, and you know it. I did not like the fact that he had tried to address me specifically a few times and not the thread. He, himself, said that it was not for the thread and more for himself, so I was correct in my evaluations of his intentions. I went wrong somewhere down the line, I can admit that, but you calling my correct evaluation and a supplement to my case “bad” is downright ridiculous!
And regarding Gorta his tone is just town IMO
His thoughts feel natural, and very similar to how he expressed his thoughts when we were a hydra
I was wrong on that, but I was still correct that he did not mean it for thread, which is what I originally thought the ISO was made for and the fact that it was not while I assumed it was supposed to appear as such made me wolf-read him. I do not know if I ever responded to him saying it was not for thread and more for himself, and that is by and large my fault. However, you calling this “bad” and “agenda” when my thought process is clearly laid out is incredibly frustrating!
I am no longer going to argue with such a muttonheaded case. I will never convince you because are mafia or your head is so far up your behind that you will never re-evaluate unless I am mechanically cleared in some form.
And I strongly doubt that anything of use is coming from this incredibly silly argument. Nobody in-thread likes reading this. Is anybody getting anything out of this?! Probably not!
I am going to read thread, drink some tea, and relax with some ISOs. I wish there were a way to put your posts on silent until I am finished with my ISOs and cases because I would much rather be doing those instead of getting distracted by your silly little argument!
I am very sorry for blowing up like this, but this argument is frustrating on a level that I had only previously gotten while arguing about politics with intolerant people on the internet.
I am going to focus on my ISOs. I am very sorry everyone, I just am frustrated currently.
Let’s not do that because it makes it easier to spot fake JOATs
If I was mafia I would have let Mole die because the mafia doesn’t care if a towny dies
Yeah, I was reading the thread and fell asleep in the process
You seem to be pushing really hard how dumb the argument is
Interesting to take a look at but my breaks over so I’m out
so from what I understand
you guys like the word, “agenda”
Idk, why defending oneself turns into more proof
either way I am going to try to speed run the rest of my game
This feels fake since if this was true, he’d be liking every post Arete made, and people don’t go around liking every post someone makes because they appreciate the person that made it. They like a post because they like that post.
There’s more than one way of playing and you aren’t considering all the possibilities here.
I personally feel that Cat v Derps is t/t, but I might do an ISO on Cat later to see what I can figure out ab out them.
Cat does have a somewhat good look to her at present though.
Hmmm, reading through now. Cat’s AtE isn’t a good look, but I do think it could be genuine.
I won’t lie. This made me chuckle a bit and knowing Derps, it’s likely the latter. He’ll likely be townreading you by the EoD2 knowing him. He does this a lot as town. He tends to focus on one person being scum like a laser no matter how townie they look. This feels just like Insurgency!Derps where he was town and convinced that a townie he literally had a greenread on was scum and was pushing on him EoD2. That was my first ever game on this site too interestingly enough. Strangely though, it feels like I’ve been here forever now and I genuinely like most of the people that have been in games with me.
I’m actually getting a lot out of the interaction between you and Derps, so no need to apologize.
Also, going after people who aren’t even consensus townreads just because they suspect you is a noobwolf move, because it’s likely to get more people to suspect you.
As for Gorta, he projected an aura of not caring EoD1, which is not something that I think a villager would project.
All due to how reluctant he was to vote.