why am I involved in this? You haven’t interacted with me over the course of the game at all.
(Of course ignoring earlier with my points which you ignored, thus I will ignore yours)
1 Like
No, negating townread without giving any strong reason in respect to it is fairly wolfy by itself. A lot of it was also done with pure conjecture such as how she wanted to negate my newbtown read by throwing in the possibility about Esq being more experienced than they look without any evidence at all. This reads more like a wolf trying to keep their PoE open rather than actual paranoia. Plus, Marsh/Me were fairly consensus reads and I don’t recall her giving out any good explanation for that read.
That’s a negative. As I said before the ratio of them trying to solve versus them negating the TRs is eye-raising enough for me to put them in the PoE.
I frankly am not going to waste any more time with this discussion. I already have you as a strong V candidate over being so stubborn here and I’ll let Whysper’s flip speak for itself.
So yeah, rn I’m basically here.
V
Alice
Surge
Appel
Marshal
Luxy
Trochi
Esquiddy
Gorta
SDA
Jane
Eli
Wazza
PKR
Insanity
Moleland
Whysper
W
Almost no interaction with me at all, just pops in and goes “I thought they were wolfy earlier, here’s a vote”
From the way they’re posting it just looks like they got TL’d then toned their posting down.
2 Likes
Mole's ISO
They start out by discrediting Alice’s early clear on Chili, yet not having an opinion on them (Chili) when Jane asks him to state his read. This is more directed at Alice themselves, and it’s nagl. It doesn’t give me TvT vibes, just because of how out of place it is as their first post.
Later I assume this is their read on Chili, which basically tells us nothing.
Does this feel genuine?
…I don’t know about that, but they’re certainly not trying to be overly serious here despite their early focus on others’ reads. “What a doughnut” I love this
This is as good as it gets to an actual read at the point where I’m at. The reasoning feels actually good, though I’m puzzled as to why there was no previous mention of this. Saying “This could be either a death wish or TMI” doesn’t line up with what they had supposedly noticed at the time.
This somewhat explains it better, but still doesn’t mention their earlier thought process. @Moleland care to elaborate, which one was it?
Apart from their opening post, they’re staying in the sidelines and talking with – and about – low-posting or low-content people rather than the more aggressive players. They haven’t interacted with them nor had any other reads apart from Chili, so this could indicate a wolf trying to stay out of the center of attention.
This is what I’m talking about. They’re making a little comment on it, but avoiding direct confrontation. However, this isn’t something exclusive to only wolves; but still something to keep an eye on.
Then the readlist.
He starts with Marshal, and a big part of it is hedge. Looking at it, there’s something that really “pings me the wrong way:”
They didn’t quote a single post from Marshal that pinged him, and this is the first time they’ve talked about him. Why didn’t they mention this before, if such posts existed?
With Alice, you can see there’s clearly much more suspicion towards her slot, but for some reason the conclusion is townier than with Marshal.
Something worth noting is that they also have Jane/Whysper/Eli/Wazza/PKR in their scumleans, and voted Wazza afterwards. @Moleland have you ISO-dived Jane afterwards? As you said Jane/Wazza aren’t W/W.
All in all, they haven’t done much solving for what I can see. They haven’t explained their thought process when it’s there, and instead stated it long after they’ve made their conclusion, which further proves the fact that they’re avoiding interacting with people/appearing too aggressive. I’m fine with cuddling this.
If you’re either a wolf or the HS then just hardclaim it already as you’re probably never living past n1.