No.
This also has 3 medium games at a time being no.
Because 3 FoL-sized games at one time is IMO too many people at once
So basically it’s just saying that
- Only one large game can run at a time
- Only two medium games can run at a time
- Two medium games cannot run alongside a large game
- Only three games may be run at a time
I think this is simpler
1 Like
I do also just want to say that I’m super grateful to the moderation team for the recent changes to the forum and it’s operations.
Even if may disagree with a few things this effort to help make the community better and addressing issues that have been voiced is at least on my end very much appreciated
3 Likes
That’s exactly my point
It’s a completely good idea to run a points system, except it’s not because people will look at it and not bother to actually read it
Yeah the system itself I think is good for the current state of the community
But your way of stating it is better
(This was a joke, by the way
Unless it actually happens
In which case we should probably just have it as an addendum)
give a certain number of points per player in the game
ask hosts of games with uncertain sizes to give an estimate for how many players they think will ply
Basically why I asked, its so like 50 50 on complaints. Hopefully we can get a system that works for all
1 Like
i think an option more aligned with these would get majority vote though
i dont think most people voting 3 would support 3 FoL/SFoL sized games at once
but like
FoL/10p vanilla/9p vanilla has no reason to not run
a flat out “2” or “3” answer is probably not enough
1 Like
I agree, thats why I like the discussion and I think thats the plan. Ive been abit busy but I plan to get wrting out a fully fledged system soon.tm