Would you rather #2

nothing

I’m also probably right in a couple hundred years morality standards will change dramatically

People will look at us and think we were caveman

It will either vanish or become way too strict no in between

It will either vanish because goverment has fallen or it will become so strict because goverment

in the end we are suffering from an imperfect system that has been designed to be imperfect

That is why I am pro anarchism for about 2 years now
Power for the people

Both to hell. Let’s face proper punishment.
Both to heaven. No innocent is allowed to be punished unjust.

. . . but for real, second argument is beating the first. Revenge is sweet, but if it’s not just, it’s nothing worth.

We can’t function without goverment nor can we function with too much goverment

1 Like

destruction and murder

We can, government as a principle is different from government as a structure
The second is unnecessary

I would be fine if goverment basically prevented us from killing our selves and that was it and we were allowed to be that way

Do you even know what is an anarchist community lol

It’d be cool to see how an experimental anarchy would work though

It has already be done

It is a common misconception that no government is equal to no rules
It isnt
It means no hierarchy

image

do you mean a community where people themselves enforce the rules they create?

You really can’t define a political movement going on for years with two lines
Also its not like words only have one meaning
Also also more misconceptions

Probably more corruption there then there is in the goverment

Basically yes, you are right

What prevents people from corruption in an anarchy