Would you rather #2

Either one is terrible

Life was already unfair, believing in godly punishment would suck because the other one did nothing to deserve it
Both to heaven and why not

1 Like

Exactly

It’s just a coin flip then, there’s no real choice.

Godly punishment is based on a rubric made by god and not the standards we put for ourselves. Which is also unfortunate

Also not like
Oh cool punishment I swear to not do it again

1 Like

There is a real choice. You can either punish a murderer with the cross fire being an innocent person, or you can reward an innocent guy while also unforutnely helping a murderer

Yeah. Society is already unfair, it’s even more unfair for a person who is suppose to be perfect in every way judge us on his standards

The concept of hell isnt great at all

1 Like

Technically you can send everyone to heaven

The real moral question
Do you sit at the cake or do you eat it

I hope no one gets it really

Depends What is heaven

The concept of hell is bad because it’s about punishing someone for no reason. You punishing them isn’t going to persuade them not to do it again because they don’t have a chance to do it again. Punishment is to prevent rule breaking. This won’t prevent it.

2 Likes

Exactly.

In fact internal torture sounds like a way to make someone even more bad and hateful

1 Like

Also a god who has purposefully allowed us to be imperfect and make mistakes and then punish us for things he PURPOSEFULLY made is also bad

If heaven is better than earth Life wouldnt it be right to kill everyone

There’s no real objective answer here.

Lets everyone raid hell so god can be proud of us
Gotta get there first

I mean We are talking about morality What did you expect