ah yes
arguing in favor of certain courses of action over other courses of action on the grounds of the specific consequences that will result from them, regardless of their conformance with traditional notions of virtue or external rules
as we all know this is extraordinarily common among non-consequentialists
Okay, here we are going to the true lawful evil part…
I want to upkeep society… because I want to rule it.
If we go by this alignment chart
http://www.easydamus.com/alignmenttracking.html#alignexp
I’m on +LN(E)
I think the given description of neutral good is compatible with virtue ethics and would furthermore argue that virtue ethicists are a more central example of the thing people think of when they think of Neutral Good
But Arete, Consequentialism has nothing to do with being NG
I used to be a pragmaticist, I’m not 100% sure if I’m still that but I still endorse it
I’m not 100% sure about the “Consequentialism” thing cuz of translation
But I thought it’s about “doing whatever has the best results”, aka teleology
What are the best results, in your opinion?
In my opinion the best result is “keeping everything like it used to be, never change a running system”
