Announcement: Updated Policy on Replacements

Forum Matches Discussion
#321

Most spectator chats are public anyways, so idk what you are talking about?

#322

Most spectator chats are not public
That is the problem

#323

You yourself just said you shouldnā€™t have specced Priestess is literally agreeing with you

#324

I thought it was pretty obvious that I didnā€™t want people to see my whining and complaining + breakdown during the game.

1 Like
#325

I thought she was saying that I shouldnā€™t have spectated if I wanted to sub in even if there was a chance it was being privated and I was being flamed

#326

Even if they arenā€™t made topics instead of PMs you can generally get access post-game which is what is meant by public here

#327

yeah if thatā€™s the case then iā€™m fine keeping it private

but if the only reason was strategical I would just have publicized it (or let amelia do it if they wanted to)

#328

Actually

Thatā€™s probably enough to completely stop Priestessā€™s stalking issue anyways

#329

I think you missed a little of the discussion. I think some people are speccing because they missed sign ups and/or want to join the cool kids - whereas it would be better if more people allowed themselves to.be available as a sub.

#330

Btw even when chats are staying private, often people who are interested in will get an invite, if everyone is okay with that.

#331

Thatā€™s what is meant by public

#332

Public being either fully publicised or allowing anyone access through an invite

2 Likes
#333

Private - nobody given access
Public - people given access

Keeping it in a DM and only giving people who ask access is still public and completely acceptable on every level

1 Like
#334

Giving a private invite to a single person.

#335

Difference is that people outside forum wouldnt be allowed in I suppose, which is what Priestess is worried about.

#336

Which is fair.

#337

I mean kyo

not all DMs on the forums will be public

some people can say things that they know arenā€™t going public

if this whole argument is because you are worried people are going to talk about you behind your backā€¦ donā€™t.

they can do that literally anywhere. Even if spec chats are all publicized (and people were flaming you, which I donā€™t think they do), people can still talk about you behind your back

itā€™s a realitiy that literally everyone has to live with so arguing for full spec chat publicization is not the hill to die on IMO

1 Like
#338

I would be completely fine with this

#339

Like literally one singular person or anybody who asks and isnā€™t just some rando

#340

fwiw

i think most of the spec chats that i have been a part of that werenā€™t publicized werent publicized for reasons that are easily fixable