Blood on the Forums VI: Monsta Jam (Evil wins)

Forum Matches Completed
#3801

PKR and Marshal I believe?
@Marshal plz confirm

#3802

I think you mean this. So PKR isn’t claiming Gambler, just getting the abilities.

#3803

cool
to be fair i didn’t read like 50% of the thread
was there two philo claims?
i remember there being two of something involving PKR

#3804

Well, I’m seeing where Marshal had an argument with himself being Gambler. Haha. :slight_smile:

1 Like
#3805

Intensify claims one of them

the 2nd one is either your slot or a drunk

The Drunk is an outsider who thinks they are townsfolk but has no ability. So I could be the drunk (who gambled myself as politician and confirmed myself as malfunctioning (either from being drunk outsider or from PKR’s ability)) or anyone else could be the drunk and we just don’t know.

#3806

My class is gambler, or at the very least I think it is. All I know is that my card says “gambler”

PKR is claiming to be philosopher → Gambler, which if true, would have made my abilities useless

I gambled myself as a class I was not, which would kill me if my abilities worked, but I lived, meaning they didn’t.

This is from me being the drunk outsider, or PKR making me malfunction

I can only be the drunk outsider if your slot is lying about your claim, which means if PKR is evil and I am the drunk outsider, you also have to be evil.

#3807

good evening my fellow townies
how was everyone’s day?

#3808

Okay, trying to see if I understand all this. So the other scenario is I’m Saint, you are truly Gambler but malfunctioned due to PKR, and PKR is truly Philosopher gaining Gambler abilities.

#3809

Hi Cantaloupe. Not sure how I’m feeling at the moment. Trying desperately not to let them lose this game for town. :slight_smile: I replaced in and have revealed that I’m actually Saint and not the Politician that App was claiming for some reason.

#3810

Yes

and in that scenario it’s likely just Arctic/Night

#3811

someone convince me why the hell a saint would ever claim politician

#3812

Yeah, and I guess that’s why App was thinking it was them.

#3813

but i’ve made my stance very clear in that I think app’s play basically never comes from saint.

I’ll re-evaluate in the morning I guess but I think if I yeet whysperslot I just win so i want to do that

#3814

My only guess is he was trying to trick info out of someone.

#3815

…and a politician claim is useful because?

#3816

Because he was trying to get scum to trust him and think he was siding with them

#3817

My original guess for app’s behaviour is that he wanted to bait holder into barber swapping with him

but it makes 0 sense to keep it past d1 after that didn’t happen, so that doesn’t explain it

1 Like
#3818

Realistically I just can’t wrap my head around app!saint ever being possible

I think whysper was likely instructed to claim saint as a last-ditch

1 Like
#3819

Ah- I see. Executing a saint claim is indeed dangerous to do, as the Minions attempted to execute the Saint Day 1 in the previous game. However, I find it suspicious that your(slot)'s claim only changed after being disproven as politician, which reduces your claim’s credibility.

#3820

Well, in your position, I can see why that seems likely. And unfortunately I can’t explain App’s reasoning.