Ok let me make something clear to you bro.
We are not lynching someone based upon how much or how little info they have provided but rather for their SR and the spews they can give.
I made a Lynch Pool so scum can’t have any lynch they desire.
By lynch pool are you guys referring to making a PoE? If that’s what your referring to then that’s fine. We want wagons to be able to form naturally so that we more information to work with after flips happen
It’s more like a small pool to limit the chance of scum to be able to have easy lynches.
Thus how it works is the lynch pool will contain 8 people today that we decide on or most of us decide on. If anyone votes outside of that they are Open Wolfing.
Here you go, here’s the current lynchpool, and don’t try remove people unless you say it’s ‘My reads, my PoE’ and not ‘Everyone’s PoE’. This is everyone’s PoE to start off with, simple.
So let’s say, hypothetically speaking, literally all the scum are in the “useless and refusing to do anything” pool (which is a >rand scum thing to do). In this world your plan just … straightforwardly loses the game?
Like, by that argument, we should just … never elim any of them, because they won’t give us enough “info.” We eliminate wolfy players even if we don’t think they give us enough spew, wolfy players will not magically disappear if we ignore them.
Opener: NAI. Shows initiative for thread control - indicative of CRich being themselves
Classifying people early on - also seems natural
I would like a little more on this take however
Although tgis is flawed, strongly taking a stance feels natural
Fyi bad argument because nost groupscum are too lazy to go ask that in their chat unless it’s really telling
Gives you a tiny bit of towncred too
At least i am when im groupscum
Id like to see this develop over the game
At this time i think centuries is a good enough player to be same as both alignments
Consistent with town meta - going one by one and reading them, even if it’s really early in the game
Again more early definitions - normal if not towny of crich
Paranoia of being ML kicks in to send massive red flags from this, but at least classifying me as scummy seems ok ish. I have no idea where they’re talking about “states the obvious” tho. Would usually hard scumread for this, but since the same thing happened in FoL 28 (where i was ss), i think they’re likely town here
Ash arc:
Problematic statement was
I say this is normal thing for a town to say
But then:
W h o a
I say this is a bold accusation
CRich responds with:
Now that’s what i call defensive
Quite an overreaction to 1 person voting
first I appreciate their commitment to “jettison”
but this feels incredibly overreactiony
like
why
ash didn’t even push CRich that hard, they were just like “wow this seems weird”
not very different from their own occasional pushes
…do I sense a deathtunnel
openwolfing d1
goodie
…yup this is a deathtunnel
i don’t see why that post is wolfy in particular
and they don’t explain it
w hat
And then:
Wow.
I quoted almost every post here up until that point
like Wow.
Ok someone needs to chill
like
Light wasn’t involved
This is the most descriptive post as to why they are accusing Ash and Mist to be openwolfing. 1) the argument is flawed, but 2) that was extremely firey
This is what I’m talking about in “flawed”
It’s extremely towny to switch opinions fast based on transpiring events
Conclusion:
At the very least CRich’s argument is flawed. A quick change of opinion is indicative of towniness. Additionally one does not need to interact with another player to be able to call them out as scummy.
From their extremely defensive reaction to a light push, I think they might be trying to intimidate the other side into backing down. Not the best strategy, in terms of game enjoyability
If I’m not mistaken, this happened when Ans bussed CRich during SFoL 61.5