So because sometimes BD act scummy there shouldnt be fool
strawman alert
You can also pretend to be fool And not BD acting scummy
Not a strawman
Actually by definition you just strawmanned
I like fool
And need to follow
Isnt enough to make it unenjoyable
No I didnt
Thatās a matter of opinion - the fact that it is antithetical to the point of the game and having wonky, adverse affects on the skill floor and ceiling is fact.
Yes Its matter of opinion
Skill is still included in game And meta helps with seeing fool play
Role isnt that usual And neither does have huge affect on game
either way Iāve Played in games with or without fool And i enjoyed additional variety it adds Regardless of it I play game to enjoy it And not to make sure it follows certain set of rules
Thatās a matter of opinion - the fact that it is antithetical to the point of the game and having wonky, adverse affects on the skill floor and ceiling is fact
Clearly itās not against the point of the game from the devās perspective else it wouldnāt be there. But a very clear point of the game from an objective perspective is reading people (itās called social deduction game after all), as long as you can theoretically read a fool he is not āantitheticalā.
Now of @Kirefitten @orangeandblack5 @Vandalay the latter is the only one doing more than bouncing soundwaves off the echochamber walls. orange literally just dismissed all 3 of my points by copy-pasting ānot all variety is goodā 3 times, firekitten at least admitted she has no argument and apparently has no intention of making one
@orangeandblack5 if you have an actual scenario where fool is unreadable then feel free to share
Literally the poster child example
And donāt even try to say āoh but thatās FoLā because the exact same Fool strategy is even easier in ToL than FoL
One point
One rebuttal
Your thread is 2,400 posts long. Please post a hypothetical from ToL, feel free to illustrate the same fool strategy from your link very briefly
2,400 posts
Hereās the Fool player
Literally just doing nothing, not talking at all. You canāt read someone who just isnāt participating.
He claimed AFK, so you executed him and he won. But the way you deal with those players is to kick them from the game. AFK claims are not a fool-specific problem.
He did not merely claim afk
He was afk
And there is no kick option lol what
He was afk. So, kick him. Itās FoL, the mod can make any option they want. He was either town and throwing (by being afk), evil and throwing (by being afk), or a fool and playing to win by pretending to be afk. So just assume heās fool as opposed to a gamethrower. Gamethrowing isnāt a fool-specific problem.
āDonāt argue FoL, argue ToLā
āItās FoL so problem solvedā
lolwut