This is very productive discussion
Oh my god I can’t infer on how wolves think because if I do that it means that I’m fabricating my read on another person
Your points are not just illogical. They are also totally logically disconnected.
Are you townreading Mercenary?
how many people have responded to any of the posts in this dialogue?
Yes. Not everyone has to follow your tunnel.
I don’t really care right now.
I have never cared about D1, and you should know that pretty well
Italy and Solic aren’t on the same team here.
That doesn’t mean that that’s a good thing…
- It doesn’t respond to reasoning
- It’s like asking for meme vote you very well know would be done
3.it just looks bad on the glance
I didn’t count
honestly that post sort of pings me
but I also like the readiness to answer a question that pilica clearly isn’t used to answering, and there clearly is some thought there, especially since it builds on the previous answer and understands how the two factors are related
gun to head it’s villagery
That’s called tinfoil.
literally nobody
we’re basically just shouting at each other in an abyss
I will say that my reads are a rare thing to see.
I prefer 3 accurate reads over 15 inaccurate reads and 1 accurate read
Quality over quantity.
Okay Mercenary, let me ask you this. Was your early posting lazy?
I mean I provided reason to why your read is bad and you continue dodging answering to it
Easy to say that after it’s called out.
actually the more I think about it the less it makes sense for a wolf to post that. Pilica clearly isn’t the sort of person to make that kind of read, as stated before, and the fact that they linked together the chaos in the thread with the question about how many wolves there are in the thread actually feels fairly TMI-free.
I’ll put the pings down to my tendency to wolfread everybody’s personalities
All my posts are being lazy
I still think they have valid points.
Except you need to post hope/despair list in night 1 that has a read on every player.