FoL Feedback Thread

And of course it wouldn’t be unique

I am waiting for squire to copy dead squire

2 Likes

we could add Squire back tbh

it just cant become a Unique BD

1 Like

I imagine 3 Squires rolled, sees a knight dies, and they all become a knight XD

what if three knights spawned, three squires spawned. One knight died during d1 lynch, 3 sqquires pick up the role. N2 5 cses

Being vanilla is very fun.
You can FPS to your heart’s content if you want to, you are a disadvantageous nightkill and convert for scum in comparison to the PRs… there are so many good things about being vanilla.

I’m not sure why Squire was removed in the first place. Was the bulletproof passive too good?

3 Likes

you can FPS without being villa

and prince is there for a reason

And then nobody will believe you when you claim your true class.
It’s a double-edged sword.

  1. depends on your meta
  2. you can apply same for VT

Honestly, Squire would be good to have back

Provides a good fake claim for scum, and trades in early game power for more late game power

1 Like

Unique + BP = stronk

Non Unqiue with no BP

Basically, Amesiac Villager into a PR

Best of both worlds

You got a regular cit early on

then a role later

It would be good in general

1 Like

Yeehaw

:cowboy_hat_face:

can you stop trying to add VT to FOL.

It can become a PR later, so it’s not technically at VT :^)

no it can’t

squire isn’t a VT

peasant is

peasant can’t transform into a different class