FoL Feedback Thread

so your play in a game should not effect how well you do in said game.

understood

aight Iā€™ma head out

FoL

ToL Fool still sucks

2 Likes

Thatā€™s not a counterargument to my point

If others play better than you, than even if you play perfectly you are still at a major disadvantage.

ok so basically

your play in a game does not affect the outcome

because other people can play better

r u on drugs

That is a basically true statement but still not one that refutes my point

If Iā€™m playing actively badly against people playing really well, then Iā€™m going to on average do worse than if Iā€™m playing well against people playing really well

1 Like

Isnā€™t your whole argument based on how players play? Why should how you play affect you, but not how others play?

Both of those things will affect you

2 Likes

Playing badly reduces your change of winning yes

That doesnt mean that We shouldnt balance NK to up their winrates

I mean sure but since nobody was arguing against this I fail to see why you bring it up

1 Like

This whole thing was becuase We talked about whether or not We should balance NK?

Thereā€™s a massive difference between ā€œNK should not win 33% of the timeā€ and ā€œwe shouldnā€™t try to balance NK whatsoeverā€

2 Likes

Youbare suggesting that we balance NK to win less than 10% of the time.

I dont go for 33% winrate but it definetly should definelty be upped

I have said that is my personal ideal

I never made any suggestions to balance NK

I donā€™t think anyone disagrees (for FoL) considering itā€™s currently like 0%

ToL is another story and Iā€™d nerf all three, but admittedly thatā€™s not strictly the purpose of this thread

Would you play a RNG game where you donā€™t have at least an equal chance to win as everyone else?

No

Irrelevant to the above answer

1: Let me introduce you to gambling

2: Would you play an RNG game where you do have an even chance???