Irrelevant of anything else, would you not play because you have less than equal chance to wim?
I wouldnât enjoy playing a game where all I and the other player do is roll dice, and whoever gets the higher number wins
I wouldnât enjoy it less if I were rolling a d12 and they were rolling a d20
At least an even chance, yes.
and conversely I wouldnât start enjoying it if I were the one with the d20
again, gambling proves that that feeling is not shared
Arete, you are avoiding the question.
Ignoring everything else, would ypu not play it because you donât have at least an equal chancd to in?
We are not talking about gambling. Where did I even mention that?
I literally already said that my chances to win have nothing to do with how much I wouldnât want to play this game
I donât know what else you want
You are saying that you wouldnât play because of something that I told you to ignore to make my point.
RNG = Random Number Gambling???
Your point is literally nonsensical because there are many many many cases of people doing exactly what youâre trying to say they wouldnât do
like jake people play games where it is inheretly less likely for them to lose than to win
example, roulette
and you know why people play it
fun
Most common forms of gambling are either pseudorandom or random
I donât see why you donât want a fair game for everyone. A fair game and a fun game and a social deduction game is possible.
Not by your definition of fair
My definition of fair is that regardless of what you are, you have the same standard and equal average win %
I want the game to be fair, I just donât think that âeveryone has a 33 percent chance to win at randâ is inherently equivalent to fair
Why wouldnât it be fair?
Iâm not necessarily saying it wouldnât be, but I think there are ways for it to be fair and for that not to be the case