Also, statistially no one is average.
There are already mechanics to discourage slanking (ie lack of discussion already hurts bd)
Average is relative and has margin for error, so a theoretically average player would likely have some standard deviation from the absolute average, but ultimately still average
Well when neither of could answer it and it doesnt move the convo forward its just filler
I improve every game. Plus NK aint main faction
NK is a faction of 1. It would be like if the Unseen started with an OP assassin.
The drawback to having a disproportionate winrate is that youāll be scumhunted, but why is that a bad idea?
Because the idea of scumhunting is finding teams
You canāt scumhunt for a solo player
Thatās
Like
The whole point of the informed minority
cough candlelight cough
The entire premise of that game was to scumhunt for solos
Despite the beasts winning, they were basically found D1. So itās not only possible, but seemingly quite easy to solohunt.
what was the result of this game
Besides, we donāt know what a 33% NK design looks like. Until we propose one, we canāt even begin to talk about it being scumhunted from D1. For all we know, scumhunting it might be a quite bad idea.
scum win
somehow
Arete won by BS reasons. But Arete was still found out.
> scum lynched D1
> scum lynched D2
> last scum claims scum to a town neighborizer N2
> scum win
P E A K
L O L
V I L L A
Ami, whatās your point?
How did this happen