FoL Feedback Thread

so your play in a game should not effect how well you do in said game.

understood

aight I’ma head out

FoL

ToL Fool still sucks

2 Likes

That’s not a counterargument to my point

If others play better than you, than even if you play perfectly you are still at a major disadvantage.

ok so basically

your play in a game does not affect the outcome

because other people can play better

r u on drugs

That is a basically true statement but still not one that refutes my point

If I’m playing actively badly against people playing really well, then I’m going to on average do worse than if I’m playing well against people playing really well

1 Like

Isn’t your whole argument based on how players play? Why should how you play affect you, but not how others play?

Both of those things will affect you

2 Likes

Playing badly reduces your change of winning yes

That doesnt mean that We shouldnt balance NK to up their winrates

I mean sure but since nobody was arguing against this I fail to see why you bring it up

1 Like

This whole thing was becuase We talked about whether or not We should balance NK?

There’s a massive difference between ā€œNK should not win 33% of the timeā€ and ā€œwe shouldn’t try to balance NK whatsoeverā€

2 Likes

Youbare suggesting that we balance NK to win less than 10% of the time.

I dont go for 33% winrate but it definetly should definelty be upped

I have said that is my personal ideal

I never made any suggestions to balance NK

I don’t think anyone disagrees (for FoL) considering it’s currently like 0%

ToL is another story and I’d nerf all three, but admittedly that’s not strictly the purpose of this thread

Would you play a RNG game where you don’t have at least an equal chance to win as everyone else?

No

Irrelevant to the above answer

1: Let me introduce you to gambling

2: Would you play an RNG game where you do have an even chance???