so your play in a game should not effect how well you do in said game.
understood
so your play in a game should not effect how well you do in said game.
understood
aight Iāma head out
FoL
ToL Fool still sucks
Thatās not a counterargument to my point
If others play better than you, than even if you play perfectly you are still at a major disadvantage.
ok so basically
your play in a game does not affect the outcome
because other people can play better
r u on drugs
That is a basically true statement but still not one that refutes my point
If Iām playing actively badly against people playing really well, then Iām going to on average do worse than if Iām playing well against people playing really well
Isnāt your whole argument based on how players play? Why should how you play affect you, but not how others play?
Both of those things will affect you
Playing badly reduces your change of winning yes
That doesnt mean that We shouldnt balance NK to up their winrates
I mean sure but since nobody was arguing against this I fail to see why you bring it up
This whole thing was becuase We talked about whether or not We should balance NK?
Thereās a massive difference between āNK should not win 33% of the timeā and āwe shouldnāt try to balance NK whatsoeverā
Youbare suggesting that we balance NK to win less than 10% of the time.
I dont go for 33% winrate but it definetly should definelty be upped
I have said that is my personal ideal
I never made any suggestions to balance NK
I donāt think anyone disagrees (for FoL) considering itās currently like 0%
ToL is another story and Iād nerf all three, but admittedly thatās not strictly the purpose of this thread
Would you play a RNG game where you donāt have at least an equal chance to win as everyone else?
No
Irrelevant to the above answer
1: Let me introduce you to gambling
2: Would you play an RNG game where you do have an even chance???